TSUKY
Price
$65.81
Change
-$0.36 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
UMEWF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TSUKY vs UMEWF

Header iconTSUKY vs UMEWF Comparison
Open Charts TSUKY vs UMEWFBanner chart's image
Toyo Suisan Kaisha
Price$65.81
Change-$0.36 (-0.54%)
Volume$33
Capitalization4.26B
UMeWorld
Price$0.25
Change-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Volume$340
Capitalization47.1M
TSUKY vs UMEWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
TSUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TSUKY vs. UMEWF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSUKY is a Hold and UMEWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (TSUKY: $65.81 vs. UMEWF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: TSUKY and UMEWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TSUKY: 18% vs. UMEWF: 29%
Market capitalization -- TSUKY: $4.26B vs. UMEWF: $47.1M
TSUKY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.26B. UMEWF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $47.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TSUKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMEWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TSUKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMEWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSUKY is a better buy in the long-term than UMEWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TSUKY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TSUKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

TSUKY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.29% price change this week, while UMEWF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSUKY is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.51% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSUKY($4.26B) has a higher market cap than UMEWF($47.1M). TSUKY YTD gains are higher at: -6.053 vs. UMEWF (-37.500). TSUKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 59.8B vs. UMEWF (-148.96K). TSUKY has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. UMEWF (8.47K). UMEWF has less debt than TSUKY: UMEWF (2.36M) vs TSUKY (3.75B). TSUKY has higher revenues than UMEWF: TSUKY (436B) vs UMEWF (4).
TSUKYUMEWFTSUKY / UMEWF
Capitalization4.26B47.1M9,047%
EBITDA59.8B-148.96K-40,143,927%
Gain YTD-6.053-37.50016%
P/E Ratio18.73N/A-
Revenue436B410,900,000,000,000%
Total Cash186B8.47K2,197,023,388%
Total Debt3.75B2.36M158,931%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSUKY vs UMEWF: Fundamental Ratings
TSUKY
UMEWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5484
SMR RATING
1..100
494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSUKY's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (98). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (84). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMEWF (94). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew significantly faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (63). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (100). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TSUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TSUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRMTX167.09N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
MNDAX24.94N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery A
NMUEX10.45N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp E
BISLX12.05N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Inv
FSHOX117.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing

TSUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSUKY and KRYAY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSUKY and KRYAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSUKY
1D Price
Change %
TSUKY100%
-0.54%
KRYAY - TSUKY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
VTSYF - TSUKY
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
UELKY - TSUKY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - TSUKY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - TSUKY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

UMEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMEWF and SOWG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMEWF and SOWG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMEWF
1D Price
Change %
UMEWF100%
N/A
SOWG - UMEWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
TATYY - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
TOFB - UMEWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
TBLMF - UMEWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGRF - UMEWF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More