Advertisement
TTNDF vs UMICF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TTNDF is a Hold and UMICF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TTNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TTNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UMICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TTNDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMICF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TTNDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UMICF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
TTNDF (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а -4.99% price change this week, while UMICF (@Environmental Services) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.98%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (+1.80% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Environmental Services (+1.96% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| TTNDF | UMICF | TTNDF / UMICF | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 3.94B | 609% |
| EBITDA | 1.93B | 389M | 496% |
| Gain YTD | -18.048 | 62.047 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.62 | 28.42 | 62% |
| Revenue | 14.2B | 16.1B | 88% |
| Total Cash | 1.25B | 1.11B | 112% |
| Total Debt | 2.68B | 2.87B | 93% |
TTNDF | UMICF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTNDF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMICF (66). This means that TTNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
TTNDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (100). This means that TTNDF’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
TTNDF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (92). This means that TTNDF’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
UMICF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TTNDF (62). This means that UMICF’s stock grew similarly to TTNDF’s over the last 12 months.
UMICF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTNDF (76). This means that UMICF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTNDF’s over the last 12 months.
| TTNDF | UMICF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
TTNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TTNDF and PFFVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTNDF and PFFVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTNDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PFFVF - TTNDF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UMICF - TTNDF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.83% | ||
| SOHVY - TTNDF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPXSF - TTNDF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| TTNDY - TTNDF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
UMICF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMICF has been loosely correlated with UMICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMICF jumps, then UMICY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMICF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMICF | 100% | -3.83% | ||
| UMICY - UMICF | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| SMNEY - UMICF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| SKFRY - UMICF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| EPAC - UMICF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FANUY - UMICF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||