UCASU
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.37 (-33.04%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.49M
WARFF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.27 (-9.41%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

UCASU vs WARFF

Header iconUCASU vs WARFF Comparison
Open Charts UCASU vs WARFFBanner chart's image
UC Asset
Price$0.75
Change-$0.37 (-33.04%)
Volume$4.11K
Capitalization5.49M
Wharf Holdings
Price$2.60
Change-$0.27 (-9.41%)
Volume$486
Capitalization7.16B
UCASU vs WARFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WARFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UCASU vs. WARFF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UCASU is a Hold and WARFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (UCASU: $0.75 vs. WARFF: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: UCASU and WARFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UCASU: 608% vs. WARFF: 43%
Market capitalization -- UCASU: $5.49M vs. WARFF: $7.16B
UCASU [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.49M. WARFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UCASU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWARFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • UCASU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WARFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UCASU is a better buy in the long-term than WARFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UCASU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WARFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UCASU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WARFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WARFF is a better buy in the short-term than UCASU.

Price Growth

UCASU (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -33.33% price change this week, while WARFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -9.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.03% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WARFF($7.16B) has a higher market cap than UCASU($5.49M). WARFF has higher P/E ratio than UCASU: WARFF (10.99) vs UCASU (5.80). UCASU YTD gains are higher at: 7.143 vs. WARFF (-5.455). UCASU has less debt than WARFF: UCASU (400K) vs WARFF (36.7B). WARFF has higher revenues than UCASU: WARFF (22.4B) vs UCASU (7.01M).
UCASUWARFFUCASU / WARFF
Capitalization5.49M7.16B0%
EBITDAN/A10.3B-
Gain YTD7.143-5.455-131%
P/E Ratio5.8010.9953%
Revenue7.01M22.4B0%
Total CashN/A23.6B-
Total Debt400K36.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WARFF: Fundamental Ratings
WARFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UCASUWARFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WARFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONLN54.010.74
+1.39%
ProShares Online Retail ETF
FINX33.340.24
+0.73%
Global X FinTech ETF
IMAY28.300.14
+0.50%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - May
CORP97.46N/A
N/A
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
LRND37.01N/A
-0.01%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

UCASU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UCASU and WARFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCASU and WARFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCASU
1D Price
Change %
UCASU100%
-33.33%
WARFF - UCASU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRE - UCASU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UILCF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VESTF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WARFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WARFF and WRFRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WARFF and WRFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WARFF
1D Price
Change %
WARFF100%
N/A
WRFRF - WARFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UCASU - WARFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-33.33%
CNPPF - WARFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - WARFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINO - WARFF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More