UMEWF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
44.71M
WHGRF
Price
$1.03
Change
+$0.03 (+3.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
13.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

UMEWF vs WHGRF

Header iconUMEWF vs WHGRF Comparison
Open Charts UMEWF vs WHGRFBanner chart's image
UMeWorld
Price$0.40
Change+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization44.71M
WH Group
Price$1.03
Change+$0.03 (+3.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization13.6B
UMEWF vs WHGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UMEWF vs. WHGRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UMEWF is a StrongBuy and WHGRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (UMEWF: $0.40 vs. WHGRF: $1.03)
Brand notoriety: UMEWF and WHGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UMEWF: 52% vs. WHGRF: 13%
Market capitalization -- UMEWF: $44.71M vs. WHGRF: $13.6B
UMEWF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $44.71M. WHGRF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $239.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UMEWF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UMEWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGRF is a better buy in the long-term than UMEWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UMEWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UMEWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WHGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMEWF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGRF.

Price Growth

UMEWF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while WHGRF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -8.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +771.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.55% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGRF($13.6B) has a higher market cap than UMEWF($44.7M). UMEWF has higher P/E ratio than WHGRF: UMEWF (49.22) vs WHGRF (8.22). WHGRF YTD gains are higher at: 28.527 vs. UMEWF (0.000).
UMEWFWHGRFUMEWF / WHGRF
Capitalization44.7M13.6B0%
EBITDA-306.34KN/A-
Gain YTD0.00028.527-
P/E Ratio49.228.22599%
Revenue1.4KN/A-
Total Cash8.47KN/A-
Total Debt2.36MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMEWF vs WHGRF: Fundamental Ratings
UMEWF
WHGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9875
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7969
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGRF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMEWF (98). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (79). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (100). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

UMEWF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGRF (44). This means that UMEWF’s stock grew similarly to WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

UMEWF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGRF (100). This means that UMEWF’s stock grew similarly to WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UMEWFWHGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATONY37.5714.21
+60.82%
Anton Oilfield Services Group
BNDSF3.90N/A
N/A
Banco De Sabadell SA
TICJ0.07N/A
N/A
Tritent International Corp.
BKFL13.70N/A
N/A
BankFlorida Bancorp, Inc.
ALRHF171.41N/A
N/A
Allreal Holding Ag

UMEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMEWF and SOWG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMEWF and SOWG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMEWF
1D Price
Change %
UMEWF100%
N/A
SOWG - UMEWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
TATYY - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
TOFB - UMEWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBLMF - UMEWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGRF - UMEWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
More

WHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UELKY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UELKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGRF
1D Price
Change %
WHGRF100%
+3.50%
UELKY - WHGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBLMF - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
UVRBF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More