UNCHF
Price
$6.87
Change
-$0.06 (-0.87%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.13B
UNLYF
Price
$60.80
Change
-$1.17 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
135.56B
Interact to see
Advertisement

UNCHF vs UNLYF

Header iconUNCHF vs UNLYF Comparison
Open Charts UNCHF vs UNLYFBanner chart's image
Unicharm
Price$6.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.87%)
Volume$9.33K
Capitalization22.13B
Unilever
Price$60.80
Change-$1.17 (-1.89%)
Volume$370
Capitalization135.56B
UNCHF vs UNLYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UNCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UNCHF vs. UNLYF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UNCHF is a Hold and UNLYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (UNCHF: $6.87 vs. UNLYF: $60.80)
Brand notoriety: UNCHF and UNLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UNCHF: 59% vs. UNLYF: 50%
Market capitalization -- UNCHF: $22.13B vs. UNLYF: $135.56B
UNCHF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $22.13B. UNLYF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $135.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UNCHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNLYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UNCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNLYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNLYF is a better buy in the long-term than UNCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UNCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UNCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

UNCHF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -9.43% price change this week, while UNLYF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.86% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNLYF($136B) has a higher market cap than UNCHF($22.1B). UNCHF has higher P/E ratio than UNLYF: UNCHF (46.30) vs UNLYF (14.75). UNLYF YTD gains are higher at: 3.226 vs. UNCHF (-8.347). UNCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 160B vs. UNLYF (14.1B). UNCHF has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. UNLYF (6.33B). UNLYF (28.4B) and UNCHF (29.1B) have identical debt. UNCHF has higher revenues than UNLYF: UNCHF (914B) vs UNLYF (60.9B).
UNCHFUNLYFUNCHF / UNLYF
Capitalization22.1B136B16%
EBITDA160B14.1B1,135%
Gain YTD-8.3473.226-259%
P/E Ratio46.3014.75314%
Revenue914B60.9B1,501%
Total Cash312B6.33B4,926%
Total Debt29.1B28.4B102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNCHF vs UNLYF: Fundamental Ratings
UNCHF
UNLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
6098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNLYF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCHF (53). This means that UNLYF’s stock grew similarly to UNCHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCHF (100). This means that UNLYF’s stock grew similarly to UNCHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCHF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNLYF (98). This means that UNCHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNLYF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLYF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCHF (84). This means that UNLYF’s stock grew similarly to UNCHF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLYF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNCHF (92). This means that UNLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UNCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UNCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMCSX33.350.25
+0.76%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
GVEQX135.160.72
+0.54%
Government Street Equity
CMLCX58.570.14
+0.24%
American Funds American Mutual 529C
VMIAX99.210.07
+0.07%
Vanguard Materials Index Admiral
PRLAX20.61-0.01
-0.05%
T. Rowe Price Latin America

UNCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCHF has been loosely correlated with UNICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCHF jumps, then UNICY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCHF
1D Price
Change %
UNCHF100%
-0.81%
UNICY - UNCHF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
UNLYF - UNCHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBGPF - UNCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSDOY - UNCHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
SPCO - UNCHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNLYF has been loosely correlated with UL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNLYF jumps, then UL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNLYF
1D Price
Change %
UNLYF100%
N/A
UL - UNLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
UNCHF - UNLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
HENKY - UNLYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
HEGIY - UNLYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
SPB - UNLYF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More