URTH
Price
$209.35
Change
-$0.58 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 28, 03:41 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VT
Price
$161.00
Change
-$0.57 (-0.35%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
97.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

URTH vs VT

URTH vs VT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) vs. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) provides exposure exclusively to developed markets through the MSCI World Index, resulting in heavier U.S. and technology sector concentration compared to broader global options.
  • Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index, offering comprehensive coverage of developed and emerging markets across all market capitalizations with approximately 10,000 holdings.
  • VT maintains a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.06% versus 0.24% for URTH, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking broad global equity exposure.
  • URTH’s portfolio emphasizes large- and mid-cap developed market equities with roughly 1,280 holdings, delivering a more concentrated profile in U.S. technology leaders.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies with representative sampling, but VT’s inclusion of emerging markets and small-cap stocks creates a wider diversification profile and different risk exposures.
  • Structural differences in geographic reach, market-cap coverage, and fees position VT as a lower-cost, more inclusive vehicle for global equity allocation relative to URTH’s developed-market focus.

Introduction

Investors comparing global equity exposure often evaluate iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) as complementary or alternative options within broad-market portfolios. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but instead represent distinct strategies for accessing worldwide equities. URTH targets developed markets only, while VT encompasses both developed and emerging markets along with all capitalization segments. The comparison remains relevant in the current market environment as investors seek durable diversification amid evolving sector rotations and macroeconomic conditions.

iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) Overview

The iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) seeks to track the MSCI World Index, which measures large- and mid-cap equity performance across 23 developed markets. The fund holds approximately 1,280 securities and uses representative sampling to replicate index characteristics. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN), and Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 25% of assets. Sector allocations feature prominent exposure to information technology (around 30%), financials, and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.24%, and the fund distributes dividends semi-annually. URTH maintains a passive structure focused exclusively on developed-market equities, with U.S. stocks comprising approximately 70-73% of the portfolio.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) Overview

The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap equities across developed and emerging markets worldwide. The ETF holds roughly 10,000 securities through index sampling and features top positions such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN), and Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), though individual weights remain lower than in narrower funds. Sector breakdowns emphasize technology (around 31-33%), financials, and industrials, while geographic exposure includes approximately 60-62% in the United States plus meaningful allocations to Japan, Taiwan, and other regions. VT carries an expense ratio of 0.06% and distributes dividends quarterly. Its passive, market-cap-weighted approach delivers broad global diversification including emerging-market participation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Global equity markets continue to reflect the influence of technological innovation, particularly in artificial intelligence and semiconductor sectors, alongside steady demand for financial services and industrial goods. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments shape capital flows between developed and emerging regions. Regulatory shifts affecting cross-border investment and corporate taxation remain ongoing considerations for international allocations. Both ETFs benefit from broad equity-market participation but experience differing sensitivities due to their distinct geographic and capitalization exposures. Emerging-market inclusion in one fund introduces additional currency and political risk factors absent from a developed-markets-only approach.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the broader diversification of Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has provided resilience during periods of emerging-market strength or small-cap outperformance, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has shown more pronounced sensitivity to U.S. large-cap technology movements. Relative positioning highlights VT’s lower cost structure supporting compounding advantages over extended horizons. Volatility profiles differ modestly, with VT’s wider market-cap and geographic scope typically moderating extreme swings compared to URTH’s developed-market concentration. Sector momentum in technology has influenced both funds, yet VT’s emerging-market components offer alternative exposure during rotations away from U.S.-centric growth themes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into holdings within URTH or VT may find the platform useful for refining allocation decisions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Key factors include its materially lower expense ratio, substantially broader diversification across market capitalizations and emerging markets, and larger number of holdings, which collectively support more consistent risk-adjusted exposure in a global equity context. URTH remains a viable option for investors specifically targeting developed-market large- and mid-cap equities with a U.S. tilt, yet the cost and coverage advantages tilt probabilistic preference toward VT under prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
URTH vs. VT commentary
Aug 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is URTH is a Hold and VT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VT has more net assets: 97.9B vs. URTH (8.23B). VT has a higher annual dividend yield than URTH: VT (14.712) vs URTH (13.761). URTH was incepted earlier than VT: URTH (15 years) vs VT (18 years). VT (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than URTH (0.24). VT has a higher turnover URTH (2.00) vs URTH (2.00).
URTHVTURTH / VT
Gain YTD13.76114.71294%
Net Assets8.23B97.9B8%
Total Expense Ratio0.240.06400%
Turnover2.003.0067%
Yield1.401.5988%
Fund Existence15 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
URTHVT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
URTH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPAI52.500.11
+0.22%
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
FTHI23.950.04
+0.17%
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
EUO29.69-0.01
-0.02%
ProShares UltraShort Euro
ICAP29.16N/A
-0.02%
Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF
OPEG2.06-0.05
-2.38%
Leverage Shares 2X Long OPEN Daily ETF