VGMIF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.03 (-60.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.6M
VLMZF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.05 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VGMIF vs VLMZF

Header iconVGMIF vs VLMZF Comparison
Open Charts VGMIF vs VLMZFBanner chart's image
Visible Gold Mines
Price$0.02
Change-$0.03 (-60.00%)
Volume$102
Capitalization2.6M
Volcanic Gold Mines
Price$0.05
Change-$0.05 (-50.00%)
Volume$26.15K
Capitalization9.44M
VGMIF vs VLMZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VGMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VGMIF vs. VLMZF commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VGMIF is a Buy and VLMZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (VGMIF: $0.02 vs. VLMZF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: VGMIF and VLMZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VGMIF: 5% vs. VLMZF: 170%
Market capitalization -- VGMIF: $2.6M vs. VLMZF: $9.44M
VGMIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.6M. VLMZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VGMIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • VGMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMZF is a better buy in the long-term than VGMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VGMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VGMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VLMZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VGMIF is a better buy in the short-term than VLMZF.

Price Growth

VGMIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VLMZF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.89% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLMZF($9.44M) has a higher market cap than VGMIF($2.6M). VLMZF YTD gains are higher at: -16.667 vs. VGMIF (-80.366). VGMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -337.68K vs. VLMZF (-2.46M). VLMZF has more cash in the bank: 4.31M vs. VGMIF (52.6K). VGMIF (0) and VLMZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VGMIFVLMZFVGMIF / VLMZF
Capitalization2.6M9.44M28%
EBITDA-337.68K-2.46M14%
Gain YTD-80.366-16.667482%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash52.6K4.31M1%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VGMIF vs VLMZF: Fundamental Ratings
VGMIF
VLMZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9389
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLMZF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (68). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's Price Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (93). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VGMIF (100). This means that VLMZF’s stock grew similarly to VGMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VGMIFVLMZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VGMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SERV11.801.16
+10.90%
Serve Robotics
COCO38.100.07
+0.18%
Vita Coco Company (The)
FSEA11.260.01
+0.09%
First Seacoast Bancorp
BA229.90-0.10
-0.04%
Boeing Company
AVIR3.49-0.08
-2.24%
Atea Pharmaceuticals

VGMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGMIF has been loosely correlated with SRCRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VGMIF jumps, then SRCRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGMIF
1D Price
Change %
VGMIF100%
N/A
SRCRF - VGMIF
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.98%
AEM - VGMIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
PNTRF - VGMIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
PNGZF - VGMIF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGAU - VGMIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VLMZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMZF and AISSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMZF and AISSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMZF
1D Price
Change %
VLMZF100%
N/A
AISSF - VLMZF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRSF - VLMZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
SGGTF - VLMZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLMGF - VLMZF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
More