Ad is loading...
VIGRX vs WSACX
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts VIGRX vs WSACX
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$181.02
Change-$5.60 (-3.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$24.87
Change-$0.49 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.06M
VIGRX vs WSACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIGRX vs. WSACX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIGRX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. WSACX (54.1M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than WSACX: VIGRX (0.39) vs WSACX (0.07). VIGRX was incepted earlier than WSACX: VIGRX (32 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.38) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. VIGRX (5.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: VIGRX (3000) vs WSACX (5000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.27 vs. WSACX (0.22). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 105.37 vs. WSACX (27.20).
| VIGRX | WSACX | VIGRX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.38 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.38 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.676 | -8.678 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 54.1M | 482,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.07 | 541% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.27 | 0.22 | 3,715% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | -6.71 | -509% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.37 | 27.20 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.17 | 9.31 | 2,547% |