Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VIGRX vs ZVNBX
VIGRX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts VIGRX vs ZVNBX
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$225.68
Change-$0.29 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.95B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$41.59
Change-$0.20 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.05M
VIGRX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIGRX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIGRX is a StrongBuy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. ZVNBX (146M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: VIGRX (0.34) vs ZVNBX (0.00). VIGRX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: VIGRX (33 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). ZVNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.62 vs. VIGRX (11.00). ZVNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: ZVNBX (2500) vs VIGRX (3000). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.23 vs. VIGRX (13.26). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 107.58 vs. ZVNBX (31.04).
| VIGRX | ZVNBX | VIGRX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.30 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.52 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.948 | 10.468 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 146M | 213,699% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 25.23 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.95 | 108.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.58 | 31.04 | 347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 308.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement