Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VIMAX vs WAMFX
VIMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts VIMAX vs WAMFX
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$358.38
Change-$0.51 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$24.33
Change+$0.29 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.17M
VIMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VIMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIMAX is a Buy and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. WAMFX (176M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: VIMAX (1.47) vs WAMFX (0.50). VIMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: VIMAX (24 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. VIMAX (16.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: VIMAX (3000) vs WAMFX (100000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.04 vs. WAMFX (6.50). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.04 vs. WAMFX (39.34).
| VIMAX | WAMFX | VIMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.00 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.02 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.709 | 5.967 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199B | 176M | 113,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.50 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.04 | 6.50 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.07 | 22.83 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.04 | 39.34 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.10 | 74.83 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement