Advertisement
VIRT vs VTRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIRT is a Buy and VTRS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
VIRT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVTRS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- VIRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VTRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VIRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTRS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- VIRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VTRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.19% price change this week, while VTRS (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +89.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
VIRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
VTRS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.42% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+2.08% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| VIRT | VTRS | VIRT / VTRS | |
| Capitalization | 3.61B | 12.1B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 1.72B | -493.3M | -349% |
| Gain YTD | 21.291 | -13.062 | -163% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.71 | 236.20 | 4% |
| Revenue | 3.38B | 14.1B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 752M | 406M | 185% |
| Total Debt | 8.94B | 14.5B | 62% |
VIRT | VTRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VTRS's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as VIRT (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VTRS’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.
VIRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VTRS (100) in the null industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than VTRS’s over the last 12 months.
VIRT's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VTRS (95) in the null industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than VTRS’s over the last 12 months.
VTRS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as VIRT (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VTRS’s stock grew similarly to VIRT’s over the last 12 months.
VTRS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VIRT (90) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VTRS’s stock grew significantly faster than VIRT’s over the last 12 months.
| VIRT | VTRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBCM | 22.75 | 0.10 | +0.46% |
| Neuberger Berman Commodity Stgy ETF | |||
| PGRO | 42.82 | 0.09 | +0.20% |
| Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
| LDDR | 86.12 | 0.08 | +0.09% |
| Stone Ridge Trust Stone Ridge 2035 Term Income ETF | |||
| PTEC | 39.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X PropTech ETF | |||
| DLS | 79.04 | -0.22 | -0.28% |
| WisdomTree International SmallCp Div ETF | |||
VIRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIRT has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIRT jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIRT | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| MS - VIRT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| GS - VIRT | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| JEF - VIRT | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| SF - VIRT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| EVR - VIRT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
VTRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTRS has been loosely correlated with ELAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTRS jumps, then ELAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTRS | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| ELAN - VTRS | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| ZTS - VTRS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AMRX - VTRS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| EBS - VTRS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| PAHC - VTRS | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
More | ||||