Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VMGMX vs WFDRX
VMGMX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts VMGMX vs WFDRX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$113.75
Change-$0.54 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.44B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$30.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.16M
VMGMX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VMGMX vs. WFDRX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VMGMX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDRX (928M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: VMGMX (0.70) vs WFDRX (0.00). VMGMX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: VMGMX (14 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: WFDRX (0) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. WFDRX (-3.89). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.85 vs. WFDRX (-16.96).
| VMGMX | WFDRX | VMGMX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.79 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.82 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.413 | -3.005 | -147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 928M | 2,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.12 | -3.89 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 27.75 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.85 | -16.96 | -424% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.01 | -15.05 | -970% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement