VRRCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.93M
VULMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

VRRCF vs VULMF

Header iconVRRCF vs VULMF Comparison
Open Charts VRRCF vs VULMFBanner chart's image
VR Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45K
Capitalization1.93M
Vulcan Minerals
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$99K
Capitalization13.12M
VRRCF vs VULMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VULMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VRRCF vs. VULMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VRRCF is a StrongBuy and VULMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (VRRCF: $0.02 vs. VULMF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: VRRCF and VULMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: VRRCF: 31% vs. VULMF: 320%
Market capitalization -- VRRCF: $1.93M vs. VULMF: $13.12M
VRRCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.93M. VULMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

VRRCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVULMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • VRRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VULMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VULMF is a better buy in the long-term than VRRCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VRRCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VULMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • VRRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VULMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both VRRCF and VULMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

VRRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.26% price change this week, while VULMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VULMF($13.1M) has a higher market cap than VRRCF($1.94M). VULMF YTD gains are higher at: 81.818 vs. VRRCF (-54.902). VULMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -792.22K vs. VRRCF (-1.13M). VULMF has more cash in the bank: 5.41M vs. VRRCF (1.06M). VRRCF (0) and VULMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
VRRCFVULMFVRRCF / VULMF
Capitalization1.94M13.1M15%
EBITDA-1.13M-792.22K143%
Gain YTD-54.90281.818-67%
P/E RatioN/A136.57-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.06M5.41M20%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRRCF vs VULMF: Fundamental Ratings
VRRCF
VULMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRRCF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VULMF (90). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VULMF’s over the last 12 months.

VULMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (100). This means that VULMF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

VULMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (99). This means that VULMF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

VULMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (61). This means that VULMF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

VULMF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRRCF (100). This means that VULMF’s stock grew significantly faster than VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VRRCFVULMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VULMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCUL13.600.90
+7.09%
Ocular Therapeutix
AUUD2.06N/A
N/A
Auddia Inc
WF52.91-0.32
-0.60%
Woori Financial Group
NAK0.85-0.01
-1.10%
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd
DLHC5.85-0.11
-1.85%
DLH Holdings Corp

VRRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRRCF and SVMLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRRCF and SVMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRRCF
1D Price
Change %
VRRCF100%
-0.54%
SVMLF - VRRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
DCNNF - VRRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+23.08%
DWMNF - VRRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSKFF - VRRCF
19%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
VZLA - VRRCF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
More

VULMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VULMF and REMRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VULMF and REMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VULMF
1D Price
Change %
VULMF100%
N/A
REMRF - VULMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
AUSDF - VULMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRRCF - VULMF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
WLBMF - VULMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
WDFCF - VULMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+31.57%
More