Ad is loading...
WCMLX vs WFGDX
WCMLX vs WFGDX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WFGDX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.67
Change+$0.24 (+2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.69M
Allspring Emerging Growth Admin
Price$9.82
Change+$0.18 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.48M
WCMLX vs WFGDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WFGDX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a StrongBuy and WFGDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFGDX has more cash in the bank: 237M vs. WCMLX (40.7M). WCMLX (0.00) and WFGDX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WFGDX: WCMLX (5 years) vs WFGDX (18 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than WFGDX (1.33). WFGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFGDX: WCMLX (100000) vs WFGDX (1000000). WFGDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.57 vs. WCMLX (-11.40). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 59.64 vs. WFGDX (-6.77).
| WCMLX | WFGDX | WCMLX / WFGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.15 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.33 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.120 | -10.409 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 237M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.40 | -7.57 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | -21.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.64 | -6.77 | -881% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -43.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers