Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WFSAX
WCMLX vs WFSAX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WFSAX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
Allspring Small Company Growth A
Price$28.71
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets537.1M
WCMLX vs WFSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WFSAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Hold and WFSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFSAX has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. WCMLX (43.1M). WCMLX (0.00) and WFSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WFSAX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WFSAX (22 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WFSAX (1.36). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WFSAX (56.00). WFSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WFSAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.99 vs. WFSAX (-12.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. WFSAX (-48.74).
| WCMLX | WFSAX | WCMLX / WFSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.28 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.36 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.543 | 4.236 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 537M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | -12.36 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.27 | -2.41 | -1,424% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -48.74 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -28.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement