Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$20.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.75M
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WTSGX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a StrongBuy and WTSGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. WCMLX (42.2M). WCMLX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WTSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WTSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. WCMLX (-0.08). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.64 vs. WCMLX (19.48).
| WCMLX | WTSGX | WCMLX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.04 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.188 | -2.699 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 251M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 7.31 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 30.73 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.48 | 45.64 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement