Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$20.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.1M
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WTSGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a StrongBuy and WTSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. WCMLX (43M). WCMLX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WTSGX (11 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WTSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WTSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. WCMLX (-1.22). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.80 vs. WCMLX (13.83).
| WCMLX | WTSGX | WCMLX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.04 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.288 | -4.261 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43M | 248M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.22 | 7.44 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.63 | 17.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.83 | 41.80 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement