Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMLX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$21.51
Change+$0.22 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.48M
WCMLX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMLX vs. WTSGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMLX is a Hold and WTSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). WCMLX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMLX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMLX (6 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WTSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WTSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. WTSGX (-3.40). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.91 vs. WCMLX (-0.83).
| WCMLX | WTSGX | WCMLX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.04 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.788 | 0.805 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3M | 291M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.04 | -3.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.43 | 32.32 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.83 | 16.91 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.30 | - |