Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WCMNX vs WTSGX
WCMNX vs WTSGX Comparison
Open Charts WCMNX vs WTSGX
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
Price$20.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.75M
WCMNX vs WTSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WCMNX vs. WTSGX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WCMNX is a StrongBuy and WTSGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTSGX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. WCMNX (42.2M). WCMNX (0.00) and WTSGX (0.00) have matching dividends . WCMNX was incepted earlier than WTSGX: WCMNX (6 years) vs WTSGX (12 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than WTSGX (1.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WTSGX (46.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTSGX: WCMNX (1000) vs WTSGX (2500). WTSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. WCMNX (-0.32). WTSGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.64 vs. WCMNX (17.96).
| WCMNX | WTSGX | WCMNX / WTSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.04 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.04 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.231 | -2.699 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 251M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.32 | 7.31 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.31 | 30.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 45.64 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement