Ad is loading...
WDNA vs XBI
WDNA vs XBI Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WDNA vs. XBI commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WDNA is a Hold and XBI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XBI has more net assets: 4.69B vs. WDNA (1.77M). XBI (-18.205) and WDNA (-18.354) have matching annual dividend yield . WDNA was incepted earlier than XBI: WDNA (4 years) vs XBI (19 years). XBI (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than WDNA (0.45). XBI has a higher turnover WDNA (15.00) vs WDNA (15.00).
| WDNA | XBI | WDNA / XBI | |
| Gain YTD | -18.354 | -18.205 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 1.77M | 4.69B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.35 | 129% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 90.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 0.17 | 491% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XBI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDS | 35.55 | 3.61 | +11.30% |
| Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF | |||
| QMAR | 26.37 | -1.25 | -4.53% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar | |||
| TOLZ | 50.27 | -2.93 | -5.51% |
| ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infras | |||
| FXU | 38.77 | -2.36 | -5.74% |
| First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| DWAT | 10.51 | -0.64 | -5.74% |
| Arrow DWA Tactical Macro ETF | |||
WDNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDNA has been loosely correlated with DNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDNA jumps, then DNA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDNA | 100% | -5.38% | ||
| DNA - WDNA | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| TSVT - WDNA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| FMC - WDNA | 18% Poorly correlated | -8.99% | ||
| EDIT - WDNA | 18% Poorly correlated | -8.04% | ||
| GNS - WDNA | 14% Poorly correlated | +10.69% | ||
More | ||||