Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WFH vs XLK
WFH vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts WFH vs XLK
Direxion Work From Home ETF
Price$69.07
Change-$0.25 (-0.36%)
Volume$112
Net Assets15.6M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$262.03
Change+$0.64 (+0.24%)
Volume$25.79K
Net Assets82.76B
WFH vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WFH vs. XLK commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WFH is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 82.8B vs. WFH (15.6M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than WFH: XLK (12.800) vs WFH (8.644). WFH was incepted earlier than XLK: WFH (5 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than WFH (0.45).
| WFH | XLK | WFH / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 8.644 | 12.800 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 15.6M | 82.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.08 | 563% |
| Turnover | N/A | 39.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.61 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| WFH | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
WFH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFH has been closely correlated with DOCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFH jumps, then DOCN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFH | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| DOCN - WFH | 72% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| NVDA - WFH | 67% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MNDY - WFH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| SOUN - WFH | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| VRNS - WFH | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||