WHGOF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
91.55M
WRRZF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHGOF vs WRRZF

Header iconWHGOF vs WRRZF Comparison
Open Charts WHGOF vs WRRZFBanner chart's image
White Gold
Price$0.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$73.89K
Capitalization91.55M
WALKER RIV RES
Price$0.13
Change-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization6.97M
WHGOF vs WRRZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGOF vs. WRRZF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGOF is a Hold and WRRZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGOF: $0.47 vs. WRRZF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: WHGOF and WRRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGOF: 56% vs. WRRZF: 69%
Market capitalization -- WHGOF: $91.55M vs. WRRZF: $6.97M
WHGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $91.55M. WRRZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRRZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRRZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both WHGOF and WRRZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRRZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRRZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both WHGOF and WRRZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

WHGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while WRRZF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1012.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGOF($91.6M) has a higher market cap than WRRZF($6.97M). WHGOF YTD gains are higher at: 195.369 vs. WRRZF (-1.894). WRRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -825.1K vs. WHGOF (-2.47M). WHGOF has more cash in the bank: 3.53M vs. WRRZF (232K). WHGOF (0) and WRRZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
WHGOFWRRZFWHGOF / WRRZF
Capitalization91.6M6.97M1,313%
EBITDA-2.47M-825.1K300%
Gain YTD195.369-1.894-10,316%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.53M232K1,520%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGOF vs WRRZF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGOF
WRRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3185

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGOF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (33). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (94). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WRRZF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGOF (35). This means that WRRZF’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

WRRZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGOF (100). This means that WRRZF’s stock grew similarly to WHGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGOFWRRZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TKPHF30.703.25
+11.86%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
AACAF5.79N/A
N/A
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc
CFXTF0.20N/A
N/A
Conifex Timber Inc.
YUBCF13.69N/A
N/A
YUBICO AB
PNPFF9.81-0.07
-0.71%
Pinetree Capital Ltd.

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
+0.53%
GSISF - WHGOF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.30%
AU - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
TORXF - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
HMY - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More

WRRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRRZF and WVMDF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRRZF and WVMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRRZF
1D Price
Change %
WRRZF100%
N/A
WVMDF - WRRZF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.34%
XTGRF - WRRZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
WDOFF - WRRZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
WTHVF - WRRZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
WHGOF - WRRZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More