WHGOF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
71.2M
WRRZF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHGOF vs WRRZF

Header iconWHGOF vs WRRZF Comparison
Open Charts WHGOF vs WRRZFBanner chart's image
White Gold
Price$0.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$36.31K
Capitalization71.2M
WALKER RIV RES
Price$0.13
Change-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization7.58M
WHGOF vs WRRZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGOF vs. WRRZF commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGOF is a Hold and WRRZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGOF: $0.36 vs. WRRZF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: WHGOF and WRRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGOF: 52% vs. WRRZF: 95%
Market capitalization -- WHGOF: $71.2M vs. WRRZF: $7.58M
WHGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $71.2M. WRRZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRRZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRRZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGOF is a better buy in the long-term than WRRZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRRZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRRZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both WHGOF and WRRZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

WHGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.63% price change this week, while WRRZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -18.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4660.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGOF($71.2M) has a higher market cap than WRRZF($7.58M). WHGOF YTD gains are higher at: 125.282 vs. WRRZF (-1.894). WRRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -825.1K vs. WHGOF (-2.47M). WHGOF has more cash in the bank: 3.53M vs. WRRZF (232K). WHGOF (0) and WRRZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
WHGOFWRRZFWHGOF / WRRZF
Capitalization71.2M7.58M939%
EBITDA-2.47M-825.1K300%
Gain YTD125.282-1.894-6,615%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.53M232K1,520%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGOF vs WRRZF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGOF
WRRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2194
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGOF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (34). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (93). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (62). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WRRZF (100). This means that WHGOF’s stock grew similarly to WRRZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGOFWRRZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DQJCY36.570.38
+1.05%
Pan Pac Intl Hldgs Corp.
BVLDF0.01N/A
N/A
Bold Ventures, Inc.
CZNL41.99N/A
N/A
Citizens National Corp.
IFUUF5.40N/A
N/A
Infrastructure & Utilities NZ Ltd.
SRGGF0.82N/A
N/A
SRG Global Ltd.