WHGRF
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.03 (+3.85%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
WLMIF
Price
$2.47
Change
+$0.20 (+8.81%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
Ad is loading...

WHGRF vs WLMIF

Header iconWHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts WHGRF vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
WH Group
Price$0.81
Change+$0.03 (+3.85%)
Volume$4.91K
Capitalization6.94B
Wilmar International
Price$2.47
Change+$0.20 (+8.81%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization19.51B
WHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGRF vs. WLMIF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGRF is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGRF: $0.81 vs. WLMIF: $2.47)
Brand notoriety: WHGRF and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGRF: 197% vs. WLMIF: 52%
Market capitalization -- WHGRF: $6.94B vs. WLMIF: $19.51B
WHGRF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.94B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGRF is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHGRF is a better buy in the short-term than WLMIF.

Price Growth

WHGRF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +9.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than WHGRF($6.94B). WLMIF has higher P/E ratio than WHGRF: WLMIF (8.61) vs WHGRF (4.87). WLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 12.268 vs. WHGRF (0.000). WLMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.01B vs. WHGRF (2.51B). WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. WHGRF (1.79B). WHGRF has less debt than WLMIF: WHGRF (4.5B) vs WLMIF (32.3B). WLMIF has higher revenues than WHGRF: WLMIF (72.4B) vs WHGRF (27.3B).
WHGRFWLMIFWHGRF / WLMIF
Capitalization6.94B19.5B36%
EBITDA2.51B5.01B50%
Gain YTD0.00012.268-
P/E Ratio4.878.6157%
Revenue27.3B72.4B38%
Total Cash1.79B3.74B48%
Total Debt4.5B32.3B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGRF vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGRF
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8870
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGRF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (12). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (99). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGRF (47). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGRF (88). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGRFWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGGAX82.630.96
+1.18%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth A
MCEFX13.970.09
+0.65%
BlackRock EuroFund Inv C
AVEGX48.380.25
+0.52%
Ave Maria Growth
CEUCX52.020.16
+0.31%
American Funds Europacific Growth 529C
JGSMX23.370.07
+0.30%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R6

WHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UELKY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UELKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGRF
1D Price
Change %
WHGRF100%
N/A
UELKY - WHGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBLMF - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
UVRBF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.05%
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+9.05%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.91%
More