WHGRF
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.10 (-9.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
WLMIF
Price
$2.31
Change
+$0.01 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHGRF vs WLMIF

Header iconWHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts WHGRF vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
WH Group
Price$1.01
Change-$0.10 (-9.01%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization6.94B
Wilmar International
Price$2.31
Change+$0.01 (+0.43%)
Volume$6.44K
Capitalization19.51B
WHGRF vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHGRF vs. WLMIF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHGRF is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (WHGRF: $1.01 vs. WLMIF: $2.31)
Brand notoriety: WHGRF and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHGRF: 68% vs. WLMIF: 6%
Market capitalization -- WHGRF: $6.94B vs. WLMIF: $19.51B
WHGRF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.94B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHGRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both WHGRF and WLMIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHGRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHGRF is a better buy in the short-term than WLMIF.

Price Growth

WHGRF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than WHGRF($6.94B). WLMIF has higher P/E ratio than WHGRF: WLMIF (8.61) vs WHGRF (4.87). WHGRF YTD gains are higher at: 25.422 vs. WLMIF (5.000). WLMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.01B vs. WHGRF (2.51B). WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. WHGRF (1.79B). WHGRF has less debt than WLMIF: WHGRF (4.5B) vs WLMIF (32.3B). WLMIF has higher revenues than WHGRF: WLMIF (72.4B) vs WHGRF (27.3B).
WHGRFWLMIFWHGRF / WLMIF
Capitalization6.94B19.5B36%
EBITDA2.51B5.01B50%
Gain YTD25.4225.000508%
P/E Ratio4.878.6157%
Revenue27.3B72.4B38%
Total Cash1.79B3.74B48%
Total Debt4.5B32.3B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGRF vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGRF
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9371
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
6498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGRF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (11). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (100). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (98). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WHGRF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (59). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGRF (90). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHGRFWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAUG27.270.12
+0.46%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Aug
BBAG46.12-0.01
-0.01%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF
XHYT34.72-0.12
-0.35%
BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF
XJH41.80-0.28
-0.66%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF
EFZ13.77-0.19
-1.40%
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE

WHGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UELKY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UELKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGRF
1D Price
Change %
WHGRF100%
N/A
UELKY - WHGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBLMF - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - WHGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
UVRBF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - WHGRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+0.43%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
More