WHYRF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
33.89M
WMLLF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

WHYRF vs WMLLF

Header iconWHYRF vs WMLLF Comparison
Open Charts WHYRF vs WMLLFBanner chart's image
West High Yield Resources
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$420
Capitalization33.89M
Wealth Minerals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization17.35M
WHYRF vs WMLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WHYRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WHYRF vs. WMLLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WHYRF is a Hold and WMLLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (WHYRF: $0.32 vs. WMLLF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: WHYRF and WMLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WHYRF: 4% vs. WMLLF: 980%
Market capitalization -- WHYRF: $33.89M vs. WMLLF: $17.35M
WHYRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $33.89M. WMLLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WHYRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMLLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WHYRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHYRF is a better buy in the long-term than WMLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WHYRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMLLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WHYRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMLLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHYRF is a better buy in the short-term than WMLLF.

Price Growth

WHYRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while WMLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +50.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHYRF($33.9M) has a higher market cap than WMLLF($17.4M). WHYRF YTD gains are higher at: 83.901 vs. WMLLF (46.286). WHYRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.48M vs. WMLLF (-3.82M). WMLLF has more cash in the bank: 929K vs. WHYRF (803K). WHYRF (0) and WMLLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
WHYRFWMLLFWHYRF / WMLLF
Capitalization33.9M17.4M195%
EBITDA-2.48M-3.82M65%
Gain YTD83.90146.286181%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash803K929K86%
Total Debt6.14MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHYRF vs WMLLF: Fundamental Ratings
WHYRF
WMLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3886
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHYRF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMLLF (57). This means that WHYRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

WHYRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as WMLLF (100). This means that WHYRF’s stock grew similarly to WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

WMLLF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WHYRF (100). This means that WMLLF’s stock grew similarly to WHYRF’s over the last 12 months.

WHYRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMLLF (86). This means that WHYRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

WHYRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WMLLF (100). This means that WHYRF’s stock grew similarly to WMLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WHYRFWMLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WHYRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPMMY27.900.51
+1.86%
UPM-Kymmene Corp.
TROUF0.02N/A
N/A
Troubadour Resources Inc.
GLGI1.17N/A
-0.17%
Greystone Logistics, Inc.
AUOTY4.62-0.13
-2.74%
AUO CORPORATION
XPPLF10.64-1.36
-11.33%
XP Power Ltd.

WMLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WMLLF and MDNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WMLLF and MDNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMLLF
1D Price
Change %
WMLLF100%
+37.86%
MDNGF - WMLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.15%
WHYRF - WMLLF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
VRRCF - WMLLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
WDFCF - WMLLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+31.57%
ELECF - WMLLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
More