WLMIF
Price
$2.36
Change
+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.21B
WLMIY
Price
$22.74
Change
-$0.04 (-0.18%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WLMIF vs WLMIY

Header iconWLMIF vs WLMIY Comparison
Open Charts WLMIF vs WLMIYBanner chart's image
Wilmar International
Price$2.36
Change+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization14.21B
Wilmar International
Price$22.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
Volume$31.77K
Capitalization14.21B
WLMIF vs WLMIY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WLMIF vs. WLMIY commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To understand the difference between Wilmar International Limited (WLMIF) vs. Wilmar International Limited - ADR (WLMIY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (WLMIF: $2.36 vs. WLMIY: $22.74)
Brand notoriety: WLMIF and WLMIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WLMIF: 79% vs. WLMIY: 79%
Market capitalization -- WLMIF: $14.21B vs. WLMIY: $14.21B
WLMIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $14.21B. WLMIY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WLMIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both WLMIF and WLMIY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WLMIY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIY is a better buy in the short-term than WLMIF.

Price Growth

WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.90% price change this week, while WLMIY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +742.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.28% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.2B) and WLMIY($14.2B) have the same market capitalization . WLMIF (12.48) and WLMIY (12.03) have similar P/E ratio . WLMIY YTD gains are higher at: 8.907 vs. WLMIF (7.209). WLMIF (4.45B) and WLMIY (4.45B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. WLMIY (2.01B). WLMIY (28.6B) and WLMIF (29.1B) have identical debt. WLMIF (69.3B) and WLMIY (69.3B) have equivalent revenues.
WLMIFWLMIYWLMIF / WLMIY
Capitalization14.2B14.2B100%
EBITDA4.45B4.45B100%
Gain YTD7.2098.90781%
P/E Ratio12.4812.03104%
Revenue69.3B69.3B100%
Total Cash12.9B2.01B642%
Total Debt29.1B28.6B102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF vs WLMIY: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
WLMIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (13). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (99). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (60). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (26). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLMIFWLMIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IXN96.200.42
+0.44%
iShares Global Tech ETF
ERTH45.990.14
+0.31%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
CCRV20.00N/A
N/A
iShares® Commodity Curve Carry Strat ETF
FNGO112.06-0.07
-0.06%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 2X Leveraged ETN
ABNY10.33-0.12
-1.15%
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+3.90%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
More

WLMIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIY
1D Price
Change %
WLMIY100%
-0.20%
TYCMY - WLMIY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
WLMIF - WLMIY
19%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
WWNTY - WLMIY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
PSYCF - WLMIY
9%
Poorly correlated
+28.80%
More