Advertisement
WLMIF vs WLMIY
To understand the difference between Wilmar International Limited (WLMIF) vs. Wilmar International Limited - ADR (WLMIY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WLMIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- WLMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WLMIY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while WLMIY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.23% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| WLMIF | WLMIY | WLMIF / WLMIY | |
| Capitalization | 14.2B | 14.2B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 4.45B | 4.45B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 6.818 | 9.576 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.43 | 12.11 | 103% |
| Revenue | 69.3B | 69.3B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 12.9B | 3.12B | 413% |
| Total Debt | 29.1B | 29.1B | 100% |
WLMIF | WLMIY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (13). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (99). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (58). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (25). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.
| WLMIF | WLMIY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DUST | 13.80 | 0.16 | +1.17% |
| Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF | |||
| GXDW | 27.52 | 0.10 | +0.38% |
| Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | |||
| FELC | 36.92 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | |||
| HCMT | 36.29 | -0.09 | -0.25% |
| Direxion HCM Tactical EnhU.S.EqStratETF | |||
| LQIG | 97.44 | -0.25 | -0.26% |
| SPDR MarketAxess Inv Grd 400 Corp Bd ETF | |||
WLMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLMIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| YMZBY - WLMIF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASBFY - WLMIF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| SAPIF - WLMIF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| WLMIY - WLMIF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| ATPC - WLMIF | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
WLMIY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLMIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLMIY | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| TYCMY - WLMIY | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| WLMIF - WLMIY | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WWNTY - WLMIY | 17% Poorly correlated | +7.91% | ||
| ATPC - WLMIY | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| PSYCF - WLMIY | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||