WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.29B
WWNTY
Price
$36.02
Change
-$1.48 (-3.95%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

WLMIF vs WWNTY

Header iconWLMIF vs WWNTY Comparison
Open Charts WLMIF vs WWNTYBanner chart's image
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization14.29B
Want Want China Holdings
Price$36.02
Change-$1.48 (-3.95%)
Volume$794
Capitalization8.59B
WLMIF vs WWNTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WLMIF vs. WWNTY commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WLMIF is a Hold and WWNTY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (WLMIF: $2.35 vs. WWNTY: $35.00)
Brand notoriety: WLMIF and WWNTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WLMIF: 124% vs. WWNTY: 18%
Market capitalization -- WLMIF: $14.29B vs. WWNTY: $8.59B
WLMIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $14.29B. WWNTY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTY is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWNTY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WWNTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than WWNTY.

Price Growth

WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while WWNTY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.52% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than WWNTY($8.59B). WWNTY has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: WWNTY (14.01) vs WLMIF (12.43). WWNTY YTD gains are higher at: 33.729 vs. WLMIF (6.818). WWNTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.84B vs. WLMIF (4.45B). WLMIF has higher revenues than WWNTY: WLMIF (69.3B) vs WWNTY (23.5B).
WLMIFWWNTYWLMIF / WWNTY
Capitalization14.3B8.59B167%
EBITDA4.45B6.84B65%
Gain YTD6.81833.72920%
P/E Ratio12.4314.0189%
Revenue69.3B23.5B295%
Total Cash12.9BN/A-
Total Debt29.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF vs WWNTY: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
WWNTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2898
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9919
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1926
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (37). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (100). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLMIF (99). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew significantly faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (57). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (26). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLMIFWWNTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSHD13.790.15
+1.10%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF
AGGH20.810.11
+0.53%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
SCYB26.570.09
+0.34%
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
LMUB48.280.12
+0.25%
iShares Long-Term National Muni Bd ETF
ULE13.01-0.02
-0.15%
ProShares Ultra Euro

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
N/A
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

WWNTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WWNTY and USNA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWNTY and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWNTY
1D Price
Change %
WWNTY100%
N/A
USNA - WWNTY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
ATPC - WWNTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WLMIF - WWNTY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIY - WWNTY
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
PSYCF - WWNTY
11%
Poorly correlated
+14.26%
More