WLMIF
Price
$2.36
Change
+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.21B
YMZBY
Price
$180.00
Change
+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.6B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

WLMIF vs YMZBY

Header iconWLMIF vs YMZBY Comparison
Open Charts WLMIF vs YMZBYBanner chart's image
Wilmar International
Price$2.36
Change+$0.09 (+3.96%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization14.21B
Yamazaki Baking
Price$180.00
Change+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Volume$3
Capitalization4.6B
WLMIF vs YMZBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WLMIF vs. YMZBY commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WLMIF is a StrongBuy and YMZBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (WLMIF: $2.36 vs. YMZBY: $180.00)
Brand notoriety: WLMIF and YMZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WLMIF: 79% vs. YMZBY: 106%
Market capitalization -- WLMIF: $14.21B vs. YMZBY: $4.6B
WLMIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $14.21B. YMZBY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $4.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WLMIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YMZBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the long-term than YMZBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMZBY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • YMZBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both WLMIF and YMZBY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.90% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +742.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.29% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.2B) has a higher market cap than YMZBY($4.6B). YMZBY has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: YMZBY (14.05) vs WLMIF (12.48). YMZBY YTD gains are higher at: 17.840 vs. WLMIF (7.209). YMZBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 102B vs. WLMIF (4.45B). YMZBY has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. WLMIF (12.9B). WLMIF has less debt than YMZBY: WLMIF (29.1B) vs YMZBY (102B). YMZBY has higher revenues than WLMIF: YMZBY (1.28T) vs WLMIF (69.3B).
WLMIFYMZBYWLMIF / YMZBY
Capitalization14.2B4.6B308%
EBITDA4.45B102B4%
Gain YTD7.20917.84040%
P/E Ratio12.4814.0589%
Revenue69.3B1.28T5%
Total Cash12.9B173B7%
Total Debt29.1B102B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF vs YMZBY: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
YMZBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1439
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2173
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as YMZBY (42). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to YMZBY’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (100). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (99). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (60). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YMZBY (73). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YMZBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLMIFYMZBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCIM20.750.07
+0.36%
abrdn Blmb Indstl Mtls Stgy K1 Fr ETF
SSUS46.570.16
+0.35%
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF
SCJ90.800.21
+0.23%
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
FLXR39.700.04
+0.10%
TCW Flexible Income ETF
IDV36.68-0.10
-0.27%
iShares International Select Div ETF

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+3.90%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
More

YMZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YMZBY
1D Price
Change %
YMZBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - YMZBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
CELV - YMZBY
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.60%
RRSFF - YMZBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOSCF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More