WTLLF
Price
$5.50
Change
+$0.30 (+5.77%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
YUMM
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.35 (-31.82%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

WTLLF vs YUMM

Header iconWTLLF vs YUMM Comparison
Open Charts WTLLF vs YUMMBanner chart's image
Water Intelligence
Price$5.50
Change+$0.30 (+5.77%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
Yummies
Price$0.75
Change-$0.35 (-31.82%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
WTLLF vs YUMM Comparison Chart
Loading...
WTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WTLLF vs. YUMM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WTLLF is a StrongBuy and YUMM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (WTLLF: $5.50 vs. YUMM: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: WTLLF and YUMM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WTLLF: 202% vs. YUMM: 100%
Market capitalization -- WTLLF: $99.28M vs. YUMM: $458.62M
WTLLF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $99.28M. YUMM’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $458.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WTLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • WTLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YUMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTLLF is a better buy in the long-term than YUMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WTLLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WTLLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

WTLLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +5.77% price change this week, while YUMM (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.50% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMM($459M) has a higher market cap than WTLLF($99.3M). WTLLF YTD gains are higher at: 6.796 vs. YUMM (-26.471). WTLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.4M vs. YUMM (-28.97K). WTLLF has more cash in the bank: 21.9M vs. YUMM (33). YUMM has less debt than WTLLF: YUMM (932) vs WTLLF (20.7M). WTLLF has higher revenues than YUMM: WTLLF (65.4M) vs YUMM (0).
WTLLFYUMMWTLLF / YUMM
Capitalization99.3M459M22%
EBITDA10.4M-28.97K-35,904%
Gain YTD6.796-26.471-26%
P/E Ratio26.95N/A-
Revenue65.4M0-
Total Cash21.9M3366,363,636%
Total Debt20.7M9322,221,030%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMM: Fundamental Ratings
YUMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WTLLFYUMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCS17.35-0.10
-0.57%
Oculis Holding AG
BOOT145.57-3.45
-2.32%
Boot Barn Holdings
EVGN1.24-0.03
-2.36%
Evogene Ltd.
RDCM11.57-0.40
-3.34%
Radcom Ltd
HST17.55-1.17
-6.25%
Host Hotels & Resorts

WTLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTLLF and YQ have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTLLF and YQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTLLF
1D Price
Change %
WTLLF100%
N/A
YQ - WTLLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
LXEH - WTLLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+36.40%
DRMKY - WTLLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YUMM - WTLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IH - WTLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

YUMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YUMM and DCMDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YUMM and DCMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMM
1D Price
Change %
YUMM100%
N/A
DCMDF - YUMM
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTKWY - YUMM
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
IH - YUMM
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
DRMKY - YUMM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCOFF - YUMM
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More