WTSHF
Price
$16.48
Change
+$0.65 (+4.11%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
ZIM
Price
$20.91
Change
+$0.09 (+0.43%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

WTSHF vs ZIM

Header iconWTSHF vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts WTSHF vs ZIMBanner chart's image
Westshore Terminals Investment
Price$16.48
Change+$0.65 (+4.11%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization1.02B
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$20.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
Volume$4.89M
Capitalization2.52B
WTSHF vs ZIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WTSHF vs. ZIM commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WTSHF is a Hold and ZIM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (WTSHF: $16.48 vs. ZIM: $20.91)
Brand notoriety: WTSHF and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WTSHF: 14% vs. ZIM: 95%
Market capitalization -- WTSHF: $1.02B vs. ZIM: $2.52B
WTSHF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.02B. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WTSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WTSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the long-term than WTSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZIM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

WTSHF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -4.21% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($2.52B) has a higher market cap than WTSHF($1.02B). WTSHF has higher P/E ratio than ZIM: WTSHF (13.81) vs ZIM (1.75). WTSHF YTD gains are higher at: 4.362 vs. ZIM (-2.608). ZIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.93B vs. WTSHF (199M). ZIM has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. WTSHF (147M). WTSHF has less debt than ZIM: WTSHF (441M) vs ZIM (5.84B). ZIM has higher revenues than WTSHF: ZIM (7.47B) vs WTSHF (383M).
WTSHFZIMWTSHF / ZIM
Capitalization1.02B2.52B41%
EBITDA199M2.93B7%
Gain YTD4.362-2.608-167%
P/E Ratio13.811.75788%
Revenue383M7.47B5%
Total Cash147M2.32B6%
Total Debt441M5.84B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WTSHF: Fundamental Ratings
WTSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGRSX12.14-0.08
-0.65%
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6
GRGUX48.76-0.50
-1.02%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
ELFNX89.38-1.45
-1.60%
Elfun Trusts
TISPX65.64-1.14
-1.71%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index R6
GRSPX25.05-0.48
-1.88%
Cromwell Greenspring Mid Cap Instl

WTSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTSHF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTSHF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTSHF
1D Price
Change %
WTSHF100%
+4.11%
CKNHF - WTSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.16%
MSLOF - WTSHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - WTSHF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - WTSHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - WTSHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
+0.43%
AMKBY - ZIM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
DAC - ZIM
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
CMRE - ZIM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
GSL - ZIM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
HPGLY - ZIM
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
More