XBP
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Updated
Oct 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.06M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
XROLF
Price
$96.73
Change
-$7.08 (-6.82%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.66B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

XBP vs XROLF

Header iconXBP vs XROLF Comparison
Open Charts XBP vs XROLFBanner chart's image
XBP Global Holdings
Price$0.50
Change-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Volume$363
Capitalization61.06M
Xero
Price$96.73
Change-$7.08 (-6.82%)
Volume$117
Capitalization16.66B
XBP vs XROLF Comparison Chart in %
XBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
XBP vs. XROLF commentary
Oct 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is XBP is a Hold and XROLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 28, 2025
Stock price -- (XBP: $0.52 vs. XROLF: $96.73)
Brand notoriety: XBP and XROLF are both not notable
XBP represents the Computer Communications, while XROLF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: XBP: 89% vs. XROLF: 52%
Market capitalization -- XBP: $61.06M vs. XROLF: $16.66B
XBP [@Computer Communications] is valued at $61.06M. XROLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $16.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.89T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $315.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

XBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • XBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XBP is a better buy in the long-term than XROLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

XBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XROLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • XBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XROLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XBP is a better buy in the short-term than XROLF.

Price Growth

XBP (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +16.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+16.66% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+1.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XROLF($16.7B) has a higher market cap than XBP($61.1M). XROLF YTD gains are higher at: -8.784 vs. XBP (-52.330). XROLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 697M vs. XBP (4.07M). XROLF has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. XBP (6.12M). XBP has less debt than XROLF: XBP (39.2M) vs XROLF (1.22B). XROLF has higher revenues than XBP: XROLF (1.91B) vs XBP (148M).
XBPXROLFXBP / XROLF
Capitalization61.1M16.7B0%
EBITDA4.07M697M1%
Gain YTD-52.330-8.784596%
P/E RatioN/A111.25-
Revenue148M1.91B8%
Total Cash6.12M2.12B0%
Total Debt39.2M1.22B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XROLF: Fundamental Ratings
XROLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
XBPXROLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
XBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIMCF1.640.04
+2.72%
Titan Mining Corporation
AUMMF0.04N/A
N/A
AuMEGA Metals Ltd
PLMUF11.02N/A
N/A
Plum Acquisition Corp. III
RYKKY10.07-0.54
-5.09%
Ryohin Keikaku Co. Ltd.
ANZFF0.32-0.02
-5.17%
Air New Zealand Ltd.

XBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XBP and SMSI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XBP and SMSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XBP
1D Price
Change %
XBP100%
+3.20%
SMSI - XBP
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SFSVF - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUTX - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
PHUN - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
ANY - XBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.42%
More

XROLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XROLF
1D Price
Change %
XROLF100%
N/A
FRGT - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
ATEN - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
NEOJF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYBF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
XBP - XROLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
More