XBP
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.02 (-2.63%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
87.28M
XROLF
Price
$103.81
Change
-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
17.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

XBP vs XROLF

Header iconXBP vs XROLF Comparison
Open Charts XBP vs XROLFBanner chart's image
XBP Global Holdings
Price$0.74
Change-$0.02 (-2.63%)
Volume$311.57K
Capitalization87.28M
Xero
Price$103.81
Change-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Volume$125
Capitalization17.51B
XBP vs XROLF Comparison Chart in %
XBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
XBP vs. XROLF commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is XBP is a StrongBuy and XROLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (XBP: $0.74 vs. XROLF: $103.81)
Brand notoriety: XBP and XROLF are both not notable
XBP represents the Computer Communications, while XROLF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: XBP: 44% vs. XROLF: 51%
Market capitalization -- XBP: $87.28M vs. XROLF: $17.51B
XBP [@Computer Communications] is valued at $87.28M. XROLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $17.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.93T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $314.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

XBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • XBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XBP is a better buy in the long-term than XROLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

XBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XROLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • XBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XROLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XROLF is a better buy in the short-term than XBP.

Price Growth

XBP (@Computer Communications) experienced а -7.74% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +217.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+4.58% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+1.89% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XROLF($17.5B) has a higher market cap than XBP($87.3M). XROLF YTD gains are higher at: -2.109 vs. XBP (-31.862). XROLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 697M vs. XBP (4.07M). XROLF has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. XBP (6.12M). XBP has less debt than XROLF: XBP (39.2M) vs XROLF (1.22B). XROLF has higher revenues than XBP: XROLF (1.91B) vs XBP (148M).
XBPXROLFXBP / XROLF
Capitalization87.3M17.5B0%
EBITDA4.07M697M1%
Gain YTD-31.862-2.1091,511%
P/E RatioN/A117.74-
Revenue148M1.91B8%
Total Cash6.12M2.12B0%
Total Debt39.2M1.22B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XROLF: Fundamental Ratings
XROLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
XBPXROLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
XBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USLIF0.01N/A
+16.86%
AMERICAN SALARS LITHIUM INC
AMIGY45.520.83
+1.85%
Admiral Group Plc.
CLCMF3.03N/A
N/A
Sinch AB
EUSHY2.90N/A
N/A
Eurocash SA
WHYRF0.28-0.01
-3.41%
West High Yield Resources Ltd.

XBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XBP and SMSI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XBP and SMSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XBP
1D Price
Change %
XBP100%
-2.15%
SMSI - XBP
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
MRINQ - XBP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSVF - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUTX - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
PHUN - XBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.90%
More

XROLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XROLF
1D Price
Change %
XROLF100%
N/A
FRGT - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
ATEN - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
NEOJF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYBF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.90%
XBP - XROLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
More