Advertisement
XYL vs ZWS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Xylem Inc. (XYL) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- XYL operates as a larger global water technology provider with broad exposure across utilities, industrial, and residential markets, while ZWS focuses on engineered solutions for commercial, municipal, and building applications.
- Both companies benefit from ongoing demand for water infrastructure and sustainability solutions, though XYL maintains a more diversified geographic and product footprint.
- Recent market activity shows ZWS trading near 48.38 as of late July 2026 with year-to-date gains of approximately 4.5%, supported by prior earnings strength and an upcoming quarterly report.
- XYL exhibits greater scale and international reach, potentially offering more stability in volatile conditions compared to the more concentrated ZWS positioning.
- Sector sentiment for water-related stocks remains constructive amid infrastructure spending and efficiency trends, with relative performance influenced by earnings visibility and macroeconomic factors.
- Trade-offs include XYL’s larger market capitalization and resilience versus ZWS’s focused growth potential in targeted end markets.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking exposure to the water technology sector often evaluate XYL and ZWS as complementary yet distinct plays on global water infrastructure and sustainability themes. Both companies provide engineered solutions that address water management challenges, making them relevant for portfolios focused on essential services and environmental efficiency. This comparison appeals to those analyzing relative performance, business model differences, and market positioning within the industrials space. It offers insights for active traders monitoring sector momentum and longer-term investors assessing growth drivers amid evolving regulatory and infrastructure landscapes.
XYL Overview and Recent Performance
XYL, or Xylem Inc., is a global water technology company that designs, manufactures, and services solutions for water and wastewater applications across utility, industrial, commercial, and residential markets in more than 150 countries. Its portfolio includes pumps, treatment systems, analytical instruments, and smart metering technologies. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected steady sector interest driven by infrastructure modernization and sustainability initiatives. Broader performance has been supported by consistent demand for efficient water solutions, with sentiment influenced by macroeconomic factors such as capital spending cycles and energy efficiency trends. The company’s scale provides a buffer against localized volatility, contributing to relatively stable trading patterns amid ongoing global water challenges.
ZWS Overview and Recent Performance
ZWS, or Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation, specializes in clean water solutions for drinking water, hygiene, flow control, and sustainable management, serving commercial, municipal, healthcare, and industrial customers. Its brands deliver products such as plumbing fixtures, drains, bottle filling stations, and pressure regulation systems. Recent market activity has shown the stock trading around 48.38 as of late July 2026, with year-to-date returns near 4.5% and one-year gains exceeding 29%. Performance has been supported by prior quarterly results demonstrating revenue growth, while sentiment ahead of the scheduled second-quarter earnings release in late July reflects attention to business updates and forward guidance in a constructive water sector environment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable automated trading strategies from a platform featuring hundreds of AI trading bots that operate across thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions, robust risk-adjusted metrics, and consistent execution styles earn placement in this dynamic section. The bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, allowing users to explore diversified approaches tailored to equities like those in the water technology space. Available data often highlights win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that vary significantly by bot configuration. This resource provides traders with transparent tools to evaluate algorithmic options. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
XYL and ZWS share exposure to water solutions yet differ in scale and focus. XYL operates as a larger entity with global reach and a broader product suite spanning the full water cycle, supporting more diversified revenue streams. ZWS maintains a more targeted emphasis on building and municipal applications, potentially offering higher sensitivity to construction and renovation cycles. Recent momentum for ZWS has been shaped by earnings visibility and upcoming reports, while XYL benefits from established international positioning. Risk factors include XYL’s greater exposure to currency fluctuations versus ZWS’s concentration in North American end markets. Sector sentiment remains aligned around infrastructure spending, though relative performance hinges on earnings execution and macroeconomic resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, scale-driven stability, and positioning within a resilient sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to XYL for its broader diversification and established global footprint, which may support steadier performance amid varying market conditions. ZWS presents compelling attributes through its focused growth profile and recent earnings trajectory, though its smaller relative size introduces higher sensitivity to specific catalysts. The assessment reflects relative positioning rather than certainty and remains subject to evolving data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is XYL is a StrongBuy and ZWS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
XYL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- XYL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
XYL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- XYL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
XYL (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.32% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +4.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
XYL is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-1.07% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (-1.86% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| XYL | ZWS | XYL / ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 27.3B | 8.38B | 326% |
| EBITDA | 1.86B | 471M | 395% |
| Gain YTD | -13.477 | 9.141 | -147% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.85 | 31.37 | 89% |
| Revenue | 9.13B | 1.79B | 511% |
| Total Cash | 1.28B | 365M | 350% |
| Total Debt | 3.06B | 550M | 555% |
XYL | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XYL's Valuation (20) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (59). This means that XYL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYL (95). This means that ZWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYL’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's SMR Rating (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as XYL (75). This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to XYL’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as XYL (59). This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to XYL’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as XYL (89). This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to XYL’s over the last 12 months.
| XYL | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 25 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||