ZIJMF vs ZIJMY
To understand the difference between Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. - Ordinary Shares - Class H (ZIJMF) vs. Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. - ADR (ZIJMY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class H and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ZIJMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZIJMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ZIJMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ZIJMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ZIJMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIJMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ZIJMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ZIJMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ZIJMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.50% price change this week, while ZIJMY (@Precious Metals) price change was -12.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| ZIJMF | ZIJMY | ZIJMF / ZIJMY | |
| Capitalization | 47.5B | 47.5B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 33B | 33B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 18.590 | 18.026 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.34 | 15.77 | 104% |
| Revenue | 281B | 281B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 25.1B | 25.1B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 125B | 125B | 100% |
ZIJMF | ZIJMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZIJMF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMY (11). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMY’s over the last 12 months.
ZIJMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMF (20). This means that ZIJMY’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMF’s over the last 12 months.
ZIJMY's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMF (39). This means that ZIJMY’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMF’s over the last 12 months.
ZIJMF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMY (55). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMY’s over the last 12 months.
ZIJMF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMY (92). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMY’s over the last 12 months.
| ZIJMF | ZIJMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FFIU | 22.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Fieldstone UVA Uncons Md-Trm Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| IBDR | 23.99 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF | |||
| IBHH | 23.21 | -0.24 | -1.03% |
| iShares iBonds 2028 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| LITP | 6.89 | -0.09 | -1.29% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| RSPG | 73.85 | -2.42 | -3.17% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF | |||
ZIJMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZIJMF and ZIJMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZIJMF and ZIJMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZIJMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIJMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZIJMY - ZIJMF | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
| WHGOF - ZIJMF | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
| PAAS - ZIJMF | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.14% | ||
| JINFF - ZIJMF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| AG - ZIJMF | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.30% | ||
More | ||||
ZIJMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZIJMY and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZIJMY and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZIJMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIJMY | 100% | -4.52% | ||
| ZIJMF - ZIJMY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AYASF - ZIJMY | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.60% | ||
| MDSMF - ZIJMY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMPUY - ZIJMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.89% | ||
| SVM - ZIJMY | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.19% | ||
More | ||||