ASRV or AUBN or BANF
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASRV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAUBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and BANF’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- ASRV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- AUBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BANF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASRV’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BANF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASRV’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
- BANF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ASRV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.00% price change this week, while AUBN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.84% , and BANF (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASRV is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
AUBN is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
BANF is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| ASRV | AUBN | BANF | |
| Capitalization | 39.6M | 66.4M | 2.9B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -7.936 | -12.972 | 5.530 |
| P/E Ratio | 24.26 | 47.50 | 13.56 |
| Revenue | 52.4M | 23.3M | 610M |
| Total Cash | 14.4M | 16.4M | 225M |
| Total Debt | 116M | 3.22M | 86.1M |
ASRV | AUBN | BANF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 11 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 28 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 57 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASRV's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUBN (42) and is significantly better than the same rating for BANF (93). This means that ASRV's stock grew similarly to AUBN’s and significantly faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.
BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASRV (88) and is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100). This means that BANF's stock grew significantly faster than ASRV’s and significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.
BANF's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASRV (25) and is in the same range as AUBN (28). This means that BANF's stock grew similarly to ASRV’s and similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.
BANF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASRV (53) and is in the same range as AUBN (57). This means that BANF's stock grew similarly to ASRV’s and similarly to AUBN’s over the last 12 months.
BANF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASRV (65) and is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100). This means that BANF's stock grew somewhat faster than ASRV’s and significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.
| ASRV | BANF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 29 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 67% |
ASRV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASRV and MCB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASRV and MCB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASRV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRV | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| MCB - ASRV | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| TECTP - ASRV | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRMEP - ASRV | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| OPHC - ASRV | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| GNTY - ASRV | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
AUBN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUBN | 100% | N/A | ||
| SSBI - AUBN | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CFBK - AUBN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FSEA - AUBN | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| PBHC - AUBN | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| UBFO - AUBN | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||
BANF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with IBOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then IBOC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BANF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANF | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| IBOC - BANF | 88% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| FFBC - BANF | 88% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| BHLB - BANF | 87% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| HOMB - BANF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| FFIN - BANF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||