BIIB
Price
$118.84
Change
-$0.67 (-0.56%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.34B
3 days until earnings call
ENZ
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.07 (-18.42%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
64.03M
50 days until earnings call
NCNA
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.10 (-15.38%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.33M
Ad is loading...

BIIB or ENZ or NCNA

Header iconBIIB vs ENZ vs NCNA Comparison
Open Charts BIIB vs ENZ vs NCNABanner chart's image
Biogen
Price$118.84
Change-$0.67 (-0.56%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization31.34B
Enzo Biochem
Price$0.31
Change-$0.07 (-18.42%)
Volume$4.12M
Capitalization64.03M
NuCana
Price$0.55
Change-$0.10 (-15.38%)
Volume$338.93K
Capitalization3.33M
BIIB vs ENZ vs NCNA Comparison Chart
Loading...
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BIIB: $118.84ENZ: $0.31NCNA: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: ENZ and NCNA are not notable and BIIB is notable
BIIB represents the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry, ENZ is part of the Medical Specialties industry, and NCNA is in the Biotechnology industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIIB: 86%, ENZ: 547%, NCNA: 338%
Market capitalization -- BIIB: $31.34B, ENZ: $64.03M, NCNA: $3.33M
BIIB [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $31.34B. ENZ’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $64.03M. NCNA [@Biotechnology] has a market capitalization of $3.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $272.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $2.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NCNA’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BIIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ENZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENZ is a better buy in the long-term than BIIB, which in turn is a better option than NCNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIIB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NCNA’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIIB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ENZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NCNA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENZ is a better buy in the short-term than BIIB, which in turn is a better option than NCNA.

Price Growth

BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while ENZ (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% , and NCNA (@Biotechnology) price fluctuated -36.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +5.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +8.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

ENZ is expected to report earnings on Jun 16, 2025.

NCNA is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+3.20% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

@Medical Specialties (+5.62% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Biotechnology (+8.19% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIIB($31.3B) has a higher market cap than ENZ($64M) and NCNA($3.33M). ENZ has higher P/E ratio than BIIB and NCNA: ENZ (208.33) vs BIIB (26.95) and NCNA (). BIIB YTD gains are higher at: -22.286 vs. NCNA (-53.773) and ENZ (-56.069). BIIB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.04B vs. ENZ (-16.29M) and NCNA (-29.33M). BIIB has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. ENZ (60.2M) and NCNA (11.4M). NCNA has less debt than ENZ and BIIB: NCNA (221K) vs ENZ (7.18M) and BIIB (7.34B). BIIB has higher revenues than ENZ and NCNA: BIIB (9.84B) vs ENZ (32.8M) and NCNA (0).
BIIBENZNCNA
Capitalization31.3B64M3.33M
EBITDA2.04B-16.29M-29.33M
Gain YTD-22.286-56.069-53.773
P/E Ratio26.95208.33N/A
Revenue9.84B32.8M0
Total Cash1.05B60.2M11.4M
Total Debt7.34B7.18M221K
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIIB vs ENZ vs NCNA: Fundamental Ratings
BIIB
ENZ
NCNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
565088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100100
SMR RATING
1..100
679497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
659697
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9610100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENZ's Valuation (4) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (50) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NCNA (50). This means that ENZ's stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s and somewhat faster than NCNA’s over the last 12 months.

ENZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BIIB (100) and is in the same range as NCNA (100). This means that ENZ's stock grew similarly to BIIB’s and similarly to NCNA’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's SMR Rating (67) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ENZ (94) and is in the same range as NCNA (97). This means that BIIB's stock grew similarly to ENZ’s and similarly to NCNA’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ENZ (96) and is in the same range as NCNA (97). This means that BIIB's stock grew similarly to ENZ’s and similarly to NCNA’s over the last 12 months.

ENZ's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (96) and is significantly better than the same rating for NCNA (100). This means that ENZ's stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s and significantly faster than NCNA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIIBENZNCNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ENZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XERS4.310.03
+0.70%
Xeris Biopharma Holdings
ELMD23.06-0.02
-0.09%
Electromed
ICFI85.72-0.13
-0.15%
ICF International
CAG24.45-0.47
-1.89%
Conagra Brands
BON0.06N/A
-6.82%
Bon Natural Life Limited

BIIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with OGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then OGN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIIB
1D Price
Change %
BIIB100%
-0.56%
OGN - BIIB
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
AMGN - BIIB
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
NVS - BIIB
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
PFE - BIIB
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
AZN - BIIB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

ENZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENZ and SINT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENZ and SINT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENZ
1D Price
Change %
ENZ100%
N/A
SINT - ENZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.15%
QIPT - ENZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
CRL - ENZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
MASS - ENZ
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
SIBN - ENZ
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

NCNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCNA has been closely correlated with RNAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCNA jumps, then RNAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCNA
1D Price
Change %
NCNA100%
-15.37%
RNAC - NCNA
93%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
AGEN - NCNA
93%
Closely correlated
-4.26%
SNPX - NCNA
92%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
ALLR - NCNA
86%
Closely correlated
+5.61%
NRXP - NCNA
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
More