It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MRNA’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSBR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MRNA’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CGEN (@Biotechnology) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while CSBR (@Biotechnology) price change was -7.70% , and MRNA (@Biotechnology) price fluctuated +9.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +7.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.88%.
CGEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
CSBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
MRNA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CGEN | CSBR | MRNA | |
Capitalization | 137M | 101M | 10.6B |
EBITDA | -14.41M | 8.43M | -3.39B |
Gain YTD | -5.882 | -14.702 | -33.959 |
P/E Ratio | 64.00 | 16.24 | N/A |
Revenue | 27.9M | 58.6M | 3.2B |
Total Cash | 103M | 3.2M | 7.03B |
Total Debt | 2.91M | 6.44M | 747M |
CGEN | CSBR | MRNA | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 66 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 10 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 44 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 69 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 49 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGEN's Valuation (50) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CSBR (50) and is in the same range as MRNA (64). This means that CGEN's stock grew similarly to CSBR’s and similarly to MRNA’s over the last 12 months.
CSBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CGEN (100) and is in the same range as MRNA (100). This means that CSBR's stock grew similarly to CGEN’s and similarly to MRNA’s over the last 12 months.
CSBR's SMR Rating (10) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGEN (92) and is significantly better than the same rating for MRNA (93). This means that CSBR's stock grew significantly faster than CGEN’s and significantly faster than MRNA’s over the last 12 months.
CSBR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MRNA (65) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEN (81). This means that CSBR's stock grew similarly to MRNA’s and somewhat faster than CGEN’s over the last 12 months.
MRNA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CGEN (19) and is significantly better than the same rating for CSBR (69). This means that MRNA's stock grew similarly to CGEN’s and significantly faster than CSBR’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN | CSBR | MRNA | |
---|---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago75% | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago73% | 1 day ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago85% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago71% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago81% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago79% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago82% | 13 days ago74% | 5 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago89% | 7 days ago79% | 12 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago75% | 1 day ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago75% | 1 day ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGEN has been loosely correlated with NURPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGEN jumps, then NURPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEN | 100% | -2.70% | ||
NURPF - CGEN | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ASPHF - CGEN | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ORMP - CGEN | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
BDTX - CGEN | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
BPMC - CGEN | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBR and SYRE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBR and SYRE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSBR | 100% | -7.47% | ||
SYRE - CSBR | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.82% | ||
SCNI - CSBR | 27% Poorly correlated | -9.29% | ||
CDIO - CSBR | 27% Poorly correlated | -6.88% | ||
XENE - CSBR | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
OABI - CSBR | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
More |