Advertisement
CL or GS or GSBD
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and GSBD’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GSBD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and GSBD’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.75% , and GSBD (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.39%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.
GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-1.57% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.29% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (+2.05% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| CL | GS | GSBD | |
| Capitalization | 74B | 134B | 1.64B |
| EBITDA | 4.25B | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -1.941 | 23.906 | 6.565 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.15 | 18.08 | 8.29 |
| Revenue | 19.5B | 46.3B | 208M |
| Total Cash | 966M | N/A | 76.6M |
| Total Debt | 9.06B | 333B | 1.83B |
CL | GS | GSBD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 81 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 12 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 5 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSBD's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (50) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GSBD's stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s and somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CL (41) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (57) in the null industry. This means that GS's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.
GSBD's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that GSBD's stock grew significantly faster than GS’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (50) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that GS's stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s and somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
GSBD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that GSBD's stock grew significantly faster than GS’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | GS | GSBD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 59% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 44% | 13 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 7 days ago 56% | 23 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 52% | 2 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JANT | 37.97 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF | |||
| FLLA | 20.84 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | |||
| IMFL | 26.93 | -0.24 | -0.89% |
| Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF | |||
| JQUA | 59.61 | -0.61 | -1.01% |
| JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF | |||
| CBXJ | 27.46 | -0.46 | -1.66% |
| Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
GSBD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSBD | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| FSK - GSBD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| BCSF - GSBD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| GBDC - GSBD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| ARCC - GSBD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| FDUS - GSBD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||