CRM or SCM or SNOW
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and SNOW’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and SNOW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SCM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SNOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while SCM (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.12% , and SNOW (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +5.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.
SCM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
SNOW is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.40% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Investment Managers (+1.24% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| CRM | SCM | SNOW | |
| Capitalization | 293B | 313M | 53.6B |
| EBITDA | 9.96B | N/A | -974.87M |
| Gain YTD | -17.593 | -2.025 | 8.581 |
| P/E Ratio | 71.97 | 16.21 | N/A |
| Revenue | 34.9B | 21.2M | 2.81B |
| Total Cash | 14.2B | N/A | 3.85B |
| Total Debt | 12.6B | 576M | 288M |
CRM | SCM | SNOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 9 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 10 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 15 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 29 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCM's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CRM (20) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (87) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SCM's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (49) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SNOW (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s and somewhat faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SCM's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (68) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s and significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SNOW's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CRM (59) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as SCM (60) in the null industry. This means that SNOW's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and similarly to SCM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SCM (97) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to SCM’s and similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | SCM | SNOW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 43% | 13 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 88% |
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | +2.13% | ||
| PATH - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| NTNX - CRM | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| DSGX - CRM | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||
SCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCM has been closely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCM jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 100% | +2.36% | ||
| FDUS - SCM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| NMFC - SCM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| HRZN - SCM | 66% Closely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| GLAD - SCM | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| MFIC - SCM | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
More | ||||