The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| CSM | EPS | CSM / EPS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.616 | 11.416 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 524M | 1.57B | 33% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.08 | 563% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 16.00 | 413% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 1.14 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| CSM | EPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 17 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSM has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPS has been loosely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPS jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| BAC - EPS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| META - EPS | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
| JPM - EPS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AAPL - EPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| MSFT - EPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
More | ||||