DDM | HDG | UWM | |
Gain YTD | -3.983 | 0.849 | -15.771 |
Net Assets | 399M | 24.5M | 320M |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
Turnover | 4.00 | 57.00 | 40.00 |
Yield | 1.06 | 3.38 | 1.48 |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | 18 years |
DDM | UWM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago87% | about 1 month ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DDM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UWM | 100% | -0.59% | ||
FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.41% |