Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FADMX or FTBFX or FXAIX
FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX
Fidelity Strategic Income
Price$11.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.37B
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.92B
FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. FTBFX (38.9B) and FADMX (14.4B). FTBFX pays higher dividends than FADMX and FXAIX: FTBFX (4.49) vs FADMX (4.08) and FXAIX (1.26). FADMX was incepted earlier than FTBFX and FXAIX: FADMX (7 years) vs FTBFX (23 years) and FXAIX (14 years). FADMX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTBFX (0.44) and FXAIX (0.01). FTBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. FADMX (72.00) and FXAIX (2.00). FADMX (0), FTBFX (0) and FXAIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. FADMX (6.08) and FTBFX (4.67). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.15 vs. FADMX (15.47) and FTBFX (-0.63).
| FADMX | FTBFX | FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | 14 years |
| Gain YTD | 2.881 | 2.890 | 2.313 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 38.9B | 634B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 4.49 | 1.26 |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 4.67 | 10.72 |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.59 | 11.90 | 66.20 |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | -0.63 | 108.15 |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.12 | 207.64 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers