Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FADMX or FTBFX or FXAIX
FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX
Fidelity Strategic Income
Price$12.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.86B
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.12B
FADMX vs FTBFX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. FTBFX (40.1B) and FADMX (14.9B). FTBFX pays higher dividends than FADMX and FXAIX: FTBFX (4.43) vs FADMX (3.95) and FXAIX (1.16). FADMX was incepted earlier than FTBFX and FXAIX: FADMX (7 years) vs FTBFX (23 years) and FXAIX (14 years). FADMX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTBFX (0.44) and FXAIX (0.01). FTBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. FADMX (76.00) and FXAIX (2.00). FADMX (0), FTBFX (0) and FXAIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.26 vs. FADMX (7.24) and FTBFX (3.82). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 109.48 vs. FADMX (16.33) and FTBFX (0.97).
| FADMX | FTBFX | FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | 14 years |
| Gain YTD | 6.915 | 6.660 | 11.406 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 40.1B | 696B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 4.43 | 1.16 |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 3.82 | 20.26 |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.90 | 15.35 | 66.89 |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.33 | 0.97 | 109.48 |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.92 | 263.18 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement