Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FDSVX or FNCMX
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$243.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.52B
Fidelity Growth Discovery
Price$67.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.31B
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$265.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.67B
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 76.5B vs. FNCMX (19.7B) and FDSVX (6.32B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and FDSVX: FNCMX (0.57) vs FBGRX (0.21) and FDSVX (0.00). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FDSVX and FNCMX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FDSVX (27 years) and FNCMX (22 years). FDSVX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47) and FNCMX (0.30). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00) and FNCMX (2.00). FBGRX (0), FDSVX (0) and FNCMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. FBGRX (12.19) and FDSVX (-0.09). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 107.27 vs. FBGRX (81.03) and FDSVX (41.88).
| FBGRX | FDSVX | FNCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.29 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.30 |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 27 years | 22 years |
| Gain YTD | 6.968 | 8.582 | 8.530 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 6.32B | 19.7B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | -0.09 | 16.78 |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.74 | 54.95 | 88.94 |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.03 | 41.88 | 107.27 |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.82 | 157.49 | 298.37 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement