Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FDSVX or FNCMX
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$261.15
Change+$3.21 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.52B
Fidelity Growth Discovery
Price$70.18
Change+$0.76 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$295.62
Change+$3.35 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.6B
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FNCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 84.5B vs. FNCMX (22.6B) and FDSVX (6.62B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than FDSVX and FBGRX: FNCMX (0.51) vs FDSVX (0.16) and FBGRX (0.04). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FDSVX and FNCMX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FDSVX (28 years) and FNCMX (22 years). FDSVX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47) and FNCMX (0.30). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FBGRX (34.00) and FNCMX (2.00). FBGRX (0), FDSVX (0) and FNCMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.81 vs. FBGRX (21.60) and FDSVX (10.99). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 109.41 vs. FBGRX (76.35) and FDSVX (39.65).
| FBGRX | FDSVX | FNCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.29 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.30 |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 28 years | 22 years |
| Gain YTD | 14.958 | 14.055 | 20.775 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 84.5B | 6.62B | 22.6B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.51 |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.60 | 10.99 | 26.81 |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.36 | 65.98 | 112.49 |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 39.65 | 109.41 |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.45 | 182.04 | 358.60 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers