Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FDSVX or FZROX
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FZROX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FZROX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$258.02
Change+$0.31 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.51B
Fidelity Growth Discovery
Price$68.67
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.43B
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
Price$23.00
Change+$0.21 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.51B
FBGRX vs FDSVX vs FZROX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 80.5B vs. FZROX (29.5B) and FDSVX (6.43B). FZROX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and FDSVX: FZROX (1.05) vs FBGRX (0.20) and FDSVX (0.17). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FDSVX and FZROX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FDSVX (27 years) and FZROX (7 years). FDSVX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47) and FZROX (0.00). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00) and FZROX (2.00). FBGRX (0), FDSVX (0) and FZROX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.86 vs. FZROX (19.53) and FDSVX (14.72). FZROX return over 5 years is better than : 106.14 vs. FBGRX (86.25) and FDSVX (45.12).
| FBGRX | FDSVX | FZROX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.00 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.00 |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 27 years | 7 years |
| Gain YTD | 13.444 | 11.504 | 11.880 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 6.43B | 29.5B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.17 | 1.05 |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.86 | 14.72 | 19.53 |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.17 | 52.38 | 63.73 |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.25 | 45.12 | 106.14 |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.26 | 185.31 | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers