Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs FNILX
FBGRX vs FNILX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FNILX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$247.51
Change+$1.21 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index
Price$22.76
Change-$0.07 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.57B
FBGRX vs FNILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 45.04B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 13.57B to 76.52B. FBGRX holds the highest valuation in this group at 76.52B. The lowest valued company is FNILX at 13.57B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 4%, and the average quarterly price growth was 6%. FBGRX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while FNILX experienced the biggest fall at 0%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FBGRX vs. FNILX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and FNILX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. FNILX (13.6B). FNILX pays higher dividends than FBGRX: FNILX (1.00) vs FBGRX (0.20). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FNILX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FNILX (7 years). FBGRX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FNILX (0.00). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FNILX (3.00). FBGRX (0) and FNILX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.47 vs. FBGRX (15.86). FNILX return over 5 years is better than : 108.13 vs. FBGRX (78.77).
| FBGRX | FNILX | FBGRX / FNILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.421 | 9.130 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 13.6B | 587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.00 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.86 | 17.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.81 | 63.48 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.77 | 108.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 229.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement