Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FXAIX or HACAX
FBGRX vs FXAIX vs HACAX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FXAIX vs HACAX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$250.10
Change-$4.12 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl
Price$124.56
Change-$1.62 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.28B
FBGRX vs FXAIX vs HACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. FBGRX (79.8B) and HACAX (28.3B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and HACAX: FXAIX (1.16) vs FBGRX (0.20) and HACAX (0.00). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FXAIX and HACAX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FXAIX (14 years) and HACAX (38 years). HACAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47) and FXAIX (0.01). HACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00) and FXAIX (2.00). FBGRX and FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HACAX: FBGRX (0) and FXAIX (0) vs HACAX (50000). FBGRX and FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 and 17.03 vs. HACAX (8.53). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.35 vs. FBGRX (61.78) and HACAX (14.64).
| FBGRX | FXAIX | HACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.67 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.72 |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 14 years | 38 years |
| Gain YTD | 10.094 | 10.756 | 9.580 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 50000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 682B | 28.3B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.37 | 17.03 | 8.53 |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.00 | 69.42 | 75.83 |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.78 | 98.35 | 14.64 |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.75 | 270.29 | 108.36 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement