Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX or FZROX or SWPPX
FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
Price$22.04
Change+$0.14 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.65B
FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. SWPPX (120B) and FZROX (28.7B). SWPPX pays higher dividends than FZROX and FCNTX: SWPPX (1.13) vs FZROX (1.07) and FCNTX (0.05). FCNTX was incepted earlier than FZROX and SWPPX: FCNTX (58 years) vs FZROX (7 years) and SWPPX (28 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than SWPPX (0.02) and FZROX (0.00). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FZROX (2.00) and SWPPX (2.00). FCNTX (0), FZROX (0) and SWPPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.39 vs. SWPPX (23.65) and FZROX (21.68). FZROX and SWPPX return over 5 years is better than : 97.08 and 96.58 vs. FCNTX (46.92).
| FCNTX | FZROX | SWPPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 7 years | 28 years |
| Gain YTD | 13.980 | 7.511 | 8.419 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 173B | 28.7B | 120B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.07 | 1.13 |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.39 | 21.68 | 23.65 |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.70 | 56.37 | 57.08 |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.92 | 97.08 | 96.58 |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.14 | N/A | 216.23 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement