Ad is loading...
FCNTX or FZROX or SWPPX
FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
Price$18.98
Change+$0.39 (+2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.65B
FCNTX vs FZROX vs SWPPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. SWPPX (101B) and FZROX (24.7B). SWPPX pays higher dividends than FZROX and FCNTX: SWPPX (1.28) vs FZROX (1.22) and FCNTX (0.06). FCNTX was incepted earlier than FZROX and SWPPX: FCNTX (58 years) vs FZROX (7 years) and SWPPX (28 years). FCNTX (0.39) is less costly to investors than SWPPX (0.02) and FZROX (0.00). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FZROX (2.00) and SWPPX (2.00). FCNTX (0), FZROX (0) and SWPPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWPPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. FZROX (4.85) and FCNTX (2.43). FZROX and SWPPX return over 5 years is better than : 98.31 and 94.23 vs. FCNTX (46.13).
| FCNTX | FZROX | SWPPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 7 years | 28 years |
| Gain YTD | -9.653 | -10.260 | -9.737 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 145B | 24.7B | 101B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.22 | 1.28 |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 4.85 | 5.67 |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.58 | 27.12 | 27.49 |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.13 | 98.31 | 94.23 |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.52 | N/A | 159.79 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...