Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX or TRBCX or VWUSX
FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$210.53
Change+$1.25 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.54B
Vanguard US Growth Investor
Price$80.34
Change+$0.46 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.51B
FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. TRBCX (67.5B) and VWUSX (49.5B). VWUSX pays higher dividends than FCNTX and TRBCX: VWUSX (0.17) vs FCNTX (0.05) and TRBCX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and VWUSX: FCNTX (58 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and VWUSX (67 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63) and VWUSX (0.32). VWUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00) and TRBCX (15.70). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX and VWUSX: FCNTX (0) vs TRBCX (2500) and VWUSX (3000). VWUSX and FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 and 17.19 vs. TRBCX (12.20). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. VWUSX (30.35) and TRBCX (29.87).
| FCNTX | TRBCX | VWUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 32 years | 67 years |
| Gain YTD | 14.503 | 12.359 | 11.830 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 173B | 67.5B | 49.5B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 12.20 | 17.84 |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.42 | 63.67 | 78.50 |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 29.87 | 30.35 |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.59 | 192.59 | 155.58 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement