Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX or TRBCX or VWUSX
FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$190.24
Change-$0.94 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.66B
Vanguard US Growth Investor
Price$73.42
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.03B
FCNTX vs TRBCX vs VWUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. TRBCX (63.7B) and VWUSX (46B). VWUSX pays higher dividends than FCNTX and TRBCX: VWUSX (0.19) vs FCNTX (0.06) and TRBCX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and VWUSX: FCNTX (58 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and VWUSX (67 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63) and VWUSX (0.32). VWUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00) and TRBCX (15.70). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX and VWUSX: FCNTX (0) vs TRBCX (2500) and VWUSX (3000). FCNTX and VWUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.42 and 10.08 vs. TRBCX (2.70). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.62 vs. VWUSX (45.74) and TRBCX (39.75).
| FCNTX | TRBCX | VWUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 32 years | 67 years |
| Gain YTD | 6.419 | 2.641 | 3.360 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 157B | 63.7B | 46B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.42 | 2.70 | 10.08 |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.71 | 63.51 | 83.85 |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.62 | 39.75 | 45.74 |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.35 | 159.00 | 126.60 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement