Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX or TRBCX or TRLGX
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$203.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.7B
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I
Price$89.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.08B
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. TRBCX (65.7B) and TRLGX (23.1B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (1.20) vs TRBCX (0.00) and TRLGX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and TRLGX (24 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than TRLGX (0.55) and FXAIX (0.01). TRLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.60 vs. TRBCX (15.70) and FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (0) vs TRBCX (2500) and TRLGX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. TRLGX (13.19) and TRBCX (10.68). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.44 vs. TRLGX (75.82) and TRBCX (41.13).
| FXAIX | TRBCX | TRLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | 24 years |
| Gain YTD | 7.804 | 9.487 | 8.970 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | 500000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 666B | 65.7B | 23.1B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 10.68 | 13.19 |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.29 | 64.79 | 72.07 |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.44 | 41.13 | 75.82 |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.43 | 169.39 | 193.00 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement