Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX or TRBCX or TRLGX
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$210.53
Change+$1.25 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.54B
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I
Price$92.06
Change+$0.42 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.37B
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. TRBCX (67.5B) and TRLGX (23.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (1.19) vs TRBCX (0.00) and TRLGX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and TRLGX (24 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than TRLGX (0.55) and FXAIX (0.01). TRLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.60 vs. TRBCX (15.70) and FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (0) vs TRBCX (2500) and TRLGX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. TRLGX (13.90) and TRBCX (12.20). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.01 vs. TRLGX (61.74) and TRBCX (29.87).
| FXAIX | TRBCX | TRLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | 24 years |
| Gain YTD | 10.376 | 12.359 | 11.389 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | 500000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 682B | 67.5B | 23.4B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.13 | 12.20 | 13.90 |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.89 | 63.67 | 70.56 |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.01 | 29.87 | 61.74 |
| Returns for 10 years | 255.17 | 192.59 | 215.54 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement