Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX or TRBCX or TRLGX
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$199.39
Change+$1.67 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.18B
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I
Price$87.88
Change+$0.71 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.5B
FXAIX vs TRBCX vs TRLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. TRBCX (64.2B) and TRLGX (22.5B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (1.26) vs TRBCX (0.00) and TRLGX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and TRLGX (24 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than TRLGX (0.55) and FXAIX (0.01). TRLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.60 vs. TRBCX (15.70) and FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX and TRLGX: FXAIX (0) vs TRBCX (2500) and TRLGX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. TRLGX (8.35) and TRBCX (5.02). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 120.01 vs. TRLGX (83.59) and TRBCX (47.20).
| FXAIX | TRBCX | TRLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.55 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | 24 years |
| Gain YTD | 5.065 | 6.153 | 5.956 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | 500000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 634B | 64.2B | 22.5B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.48 | 5.02 | 8.35 |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.10 | 67.21 | 74.93 |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.01 | 47.20 | 83.59 |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.12 | 176.47 | 201.17 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement