Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZIPX or FZROX or SWTSX
FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX Comparison
Open Charts FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index
Price$14.70
Change+$0.45 (+3.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
Price$22.53
Change+$0.37 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.65B
Schwab Total Stock Market Index
Price$15.65
Change+$0.26 (+1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.68B
FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWTSX and FZROX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B and 28.7B vs. FZIPX (1.83B). FZIPX and SWTSX pays higher dividends than FZROX: FZIPX (1.19) and SWTSX (1.14) vs FZROX (1.07). FZIPX was incepted earlier than FZROX and SWTSX: FZIPX (7 years) vs FZROX (7 years) and SWTSX (26 years). SWTSX (0.03) is less costly to investors than FZIPX (0.00) and FZROX (0.00). FZIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. FZROX (2.00) and SWTSX (2.00). FZIPX (0), FZROX (0) and SWTSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1806.01 vs. FZROX (15.81) and FZIPX (9.95). SWTSX return over 5 years is better than : 481721.72 vs. FZROX (96.77) and FZIPX (61.38).
| FZIPX | FZROX | SWTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | 26 years |
| Gain YTD | 4.702 | 8.787 | 661.037 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 28.7B | 29.7B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.14 |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 15.81 | 1806.01 |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.71 | 58.88 | 35737.19 |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.38 | 96.77 | 481721.72 |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | 53402755000.00 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement