Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZIPX or FZROX or SWTSX
FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX Comparison
Open Charts FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index
Price$13.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
Price$20.60
Change-$0.08 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.58B
Schwab Total Stock Market Index
Price$98.44
Change-$1.74 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.42B
FZIPX vs FZROX vs SWTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWTSX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FZROX (24.6B) and FZIPX (1.63B). FZIPX and SWTSX pays higher dividends than FZROX: FZIPX (1.34) and SWTSX (1.31) vs FZROX (1.23). FZIPX was incepted earlier than FZROX and SWTSX: FZIPX (7 years) vs FZROX (7 years) and SWTSX (26 years). SWTSX (0.03) is less costly to investors than FZIPX (0.00) and FZROX (0.00). FZIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. FZROX (2.00) and SWTSX (2.00). FZIPX (0), FZROX (0) and SWTSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZROX and SWTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 and 12.51 vs. FZIPX (5.08). FZROX and SWTSX return over 5 years is better than : 112.05 and 110.01 vs. FZIPX (74.23).
| FZIPX | FZROX | SWTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | 26 years |
| Gain YTD | -1.690 | 1.129 | 1.100 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 24.6B | 27.4B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.23 | 1.31 |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 12.54 | 12.51 |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.05 | 56.99 | 56.37 |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.23 | 112.05 | 110.01 |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | 204.63 |