It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TAC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TAC’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.06% , and TAC (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated +7.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.20%.
LAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
SQM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.
TAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.35% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Electric Utilities (-0.09% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
LAC | SQM | TAC | |
Capitalization | 1.14B | 14B | 1.98B |
EBITDA | -3.27M | 2.94B | 1.76B |
Gain YTD | -10.774 | -9.846 | -21.625 |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.95 | 3.72 |
Revenue | 0 | 7.47B | 3.36B |
Total Cash | 196M | 2.36B | 348M |
Total Debt | 3.11M | 4.49B | 4.21B |
LAC | SQM | TAC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 3 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 91 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 83 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 40 | 14 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAC's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (81) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TAC (96) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that LAC's stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s and somewhat faster than TAC’s over the last 12 months.
TAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (80) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that TAC's stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s and somewhat faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.
LAC's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as TAC (89) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as SQM (91) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that LAC's stock grew similarly to TAC’s and similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
TAC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAC (83) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (83) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that TAC's stock grew somewhat faster than LAC’s and somewhat faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.
TAC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQM (95) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that TAC's stock grew significantly faster than SQM’s and significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.
LAC | SQM | TAC | |
---|---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago80% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago80% | 5 days ago74% | 3 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago87% | 1 day ago75% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago53% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAC has been loosely correlated with VST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAC jumps, then VST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TAC | 100% | -2.80% | ||
VST - TAC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
CPXWF - TAC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
ACLLF - TAC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
PEG - TAC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
OGE - TAC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More |