MMM
Price
$148.75
Change
-$4.13 (-2.70%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
79.23B
10 days until earnings call
PG
Price
$149.69
Change
-$0.89 (-0.59%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
350.35B
13 days until earnings call
UG
Price
$7.44
Change
-$0.11 (-1.46%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
34.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMM or PG or UG

Header iconMMM vs PG vs UG Comparison
Open Charts MMM vs PG vs UGBanner chart's image
3M
Price$148.75
Change-$4.13 (-2.70%)
Volume$3.5M
Capitalization79.23B
Procter & Gamble
Price$149.69
Change-$0.89 (-0.59%)
Volume$7.37M
Capitalization350.35B
United-Guardian
Price$7.44
Change-$0.11 (-1.46%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization34.18M
MMM vs PG vs UG Comparison Chart in %
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MMM: $148.75PG: $149.69UG: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: MMM and PG are notable and UG is not notable
PG and UG are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and MMM is in the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMM: 128%, PG: 106%, UG: 174%
Market capitalization -- MMM: $79.23B, PG: $350.35B, UG: $34.18M
$PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $350.35B. $UG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $34.18M. $MMM [@Industrial Conglomerates] has a market capitalization of $ $79.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $350.35B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $ $131.16B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $21.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $ $14.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than UG, which in turn is a better option than MMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and UG’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than MMM, which in turn is a better option than UG.

Price Growth

MMM (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.69% , and UG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated -4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-1.14% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Household/Personal Care (+1.40% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($350B) has a higher market cap than MMM($79.2B) and UG($34.2M). PG has higher P/E ratio than MMM and UG: PG (22.99) vs MMM (20.66) and UG (13.29). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 16.904 vs. PG (-8.991) and UG (-17.470). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.9B vs. MMM (7.02B) and UG (2.91M). PG has more cash in the bank: 9.56B vs. MMM (4.21B) and UG (8.42M). UG has less debt than MMM and PG: UG (4.66K) vs MMM (13.7B) and PG (35.5B). PG has higher revenues than MMM and UG: PG (84.3B) vs MMM (24.6B) and UG (10.9M).
MMMPGUG
Capitalization79.2B350B34.2M
EBITDA7.02B23.9B2.91M
Gain YTD16.904-8.991-17.470
P/E Ratio20.6622.9913.29
Revenue24.6B84.3B10.9M
Total Cash4.21B9.56B8.42M
Total Debt13.7B35.5B4.66K
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMM vs PG vs UG: Fundamental Ratings
MMM
PG
UG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
635650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6553100
SMR RATING
1..100
143142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
536281
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
977281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UG's Valuation (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (45) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (84) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that UG's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MMM (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UG (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to MMM’s and somewhat faster than UG’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UG (42) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UG’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UG (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UG (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MMM (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UG’s and similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMMPGUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFSB25.310.05
+0.20%
MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
BKN11.320.01
+0.09%
BlackRock Investment Quality Municipal Trust
BEMB53.85N/A
N/A
iShares J.P. Morgan Brd USD Emr MktBdETF
BUYW14.18-0.05
-0.35%
Main BuyWrite ETF
SCHF23.02-0.44
-1.88%
Schwab International Equity ETF™

UG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UG and ACU have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UG and ACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UG
1D Price
Change %
UG100%
-1.46%
ACU - UG
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
CLX - UG
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SKIN - UG
15%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
SPB - UG
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
EPC - UG
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
More