Advertisement
MMM or PG or UG
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -4.83% price change this week, while UG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -4.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
UG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+0.84% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MMM | PG | UG | |
| Capitalization | 58.7B | 382B | 36.1M |
| EBITDA | -6.76B | 22.6B | 2.97M |
| Gain YTD | 12.972 | -8.407 | -11.147 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.77 | 26.90 | 14.02 |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 83.9B | 10.9M |
| Total Cash | 5.99B | 7.89B | 9.09M |
| Total Debt | 16.9B | 33.7B | 4.66K |
MMM | PG | UG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 52 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 32 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 71 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UG's Valuation (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (42) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (92) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that UG's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MMM (61) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UG (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to MMM’s and somewhat faster than UG’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's SMR Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (32) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UG (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UG’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UG (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UG’s over the last 12 months.
PG's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UG (83) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MMM (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UG’s and similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.
| MMM | PG | UG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 17 days ago 44% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DECM | 31.68 | -0.09 | -0.29% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| NML | 8.68 | -0.08 | -0.91% |
| Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund | |||
| FTXR | 31.65 | -0.68 | -2.10% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | |||
| EWY | 70.65 | -2.16 | -2.97% |
| iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | |||
| STCE | 51.31 | -3.52 | -6.42% |
| Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF | |||
MMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
UG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UG and SKIN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UG and SKIN's prices will move in lockstep.