Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QQQ or SMH or XLF
QQQ vs SMH vs XLF Comparison
Open Charts QQQ vs SMH vs XLF
Invesco QQQ Trust
Price$556.22
Change+$5.42 (+0.98%)
Volume$26.44M
Net Assets352.86B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$283.62
Change+$2.37 (+0.84%)
Volume$94.62K
Net Assets26.46B
The Financial Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$53.18
Change+$0.56 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.6B
QQQ vs SMH vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQ has more net assets: 353B vs. XLF (50.6B) and SMH (26.5B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF and QQQ: SMH (17.116) vs XLF (10.834) and QQQ (9.085). QQQ was incepted earlier than SMH and XLF: QQQ (26 years) vs SMH (14 years) and XLF (27 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than QQQ (0.20) and SMH (0.35). SMH has a higher turnover QQQ (8.07) and XLF (3.00) vs QQQ (8.07) and XLF (3.00).
| QQQ | SMH | XLF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.085 | 17.116 | 10.834 |
| Net Assets | 353B | 26.5B | 50.6B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.08 |
| Turnover | 8.07 | 15.00 | 3.00 |
| Yield | 0.51 | 0.38 | 1.38 |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | 27 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QQQ | SMH | XLF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | N/A | 29 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLF | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| HBAN - XLF | 85% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| RF - XLF | 83% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TFC - XLF | 83% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CPAY - XLF | 82% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| CFG - XLF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||