Ardmore Shipping operates a modern fleet of product and chemical tankers that transport refined products and other liquid cargoes around the world. Its earnings are closely tied to spot charter rates, which fluctuate with geopolitical disruption, refining activity, and vessel supply. The third quarter of 2026 arrived after an exceptionally strong first half, during which ASC benefited from trade dislocation and tighter product tanker markets. Because the company generates the majority of its revenue on the spot market, investors watch its TCE rates and forward bookings closely as a signal of near-term cash flow. This report also matters because it frames management's capital allocation—including dividends and fleet renewal—against a backdrop of historically elevated refining margins and low product inventories. I checked some peer comparisons using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how ASC stacks up in the sector.
For the three months ended September 30, 2026, Ardmore Shipping reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $16.3 million, or $0.40 per basic and diluted share, compared with $12.1 million, or $0.30 per share, in the same period a year earlier. Revenue totaled $87.7 million, up $6.5 million from $81.2 million in the third quarter of 2025, driven primarily by higher spot charter rates that added $11.1 million, partially offset by fewer spot revenue days.
The fleet-wide average TCE rate reached $25,358 per day, up from $23,475 per day a year ago. MR tankers earned $27,000 per day during the quarter, while chemical tankers earned $23,300 per day. Adjusted EBITDA came in at $28.8 million. Against consensus, results were mixed. Revenue of $87.7 million exceeded the roughly $64.5 million analyst estimate, while earnings per share of $0.40 fell short of the approximately $0.70 consensus figure. The company declared a dividend of $0.27 per share and reported a low operating cash breakeven of $10,800 per day. From what I see, the revenue strength stands out here.
Investor focus heading into this report centered on whether the strong freight environment of the first half would persist through a seasonally softer third quarter. While headline earnings per share came in below consensus estimates, the revenue beat and management's sharply improved fourth-quarter booking rates provided a more constructive signal. Management described the third quarter as historically strong despite being softer sequentially, and noted that rates have been accelerating meaningfully into the fourth quarter, with recent MR bookings north of $80,000 per day. The combination of an EPS shortfall against elevated expectations and a favorable forward rate trajectory left the market weighing near-term execution against strong momentum into the winter.
Ardmore enters the fourth quarter with notable operating momentum. MR tankers were booked at roughly $57,600 per day with 45% of revenue days fixed, roughly double the prior-year level, while chemical tankers were booked at about $30,100 per day with 60% fixed. Management pointed to refining margins that remain well above historical norms and product inventories at multiyear lows, factors that could support additional restocking demand.
Investors will want to monitor how spot TCE rates evolve through the winter, since a large portion of the fleet trades on the spot market and earnings are highly sensitive to rate movements. Supply-side dynamics also remain relevant: management highlighted an aging fleet, with a meaningful share of MR and Handysize tankers approaching 20 years of age, which could limit effective vessel supply over time. On the capital allocation front, the company continues to balance shareholder returns with fleet renewal, including six contracted Handysize tanker newbuildings with deliveries starting in 2028. Geopolitical developments, changes in refining throughput, and any resolution or escalation of trade disruptions remain key variables that could shift tanker demand and rates in either direction. I’m watching this closely as winter unfolds.
In my analysis, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter shipping names and spot patterns that align with current market conditions. It helps surface comparable opportunities without hours of manual work, and I find the customizable filters particularly useful when tracking sectors like tankers. This approach keeps my review efficient while staying grounded in the data.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
ASC moved below its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 33 of 42 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ASC as a result. In 61 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ASC turned negative on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 25 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 52%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ASC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ASC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.31% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ASC advanced for three days, in 269 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
ASC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 254 of 341 cases where ASC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 74%.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 66, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ASC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 55 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.017) is normal, around the industry mean (-113.496). P/E Ratio (6.726) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.821). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.100) is also within normal values, averaging (0.581). Dividend Yield (0.181) settles around the average of (16.829) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.119) is also within normal values, averaging (1.795).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of seaborne transportation of petroleum products and chemicals
Industry MarineShipping